ArticlePatient safety in surgery2016
Factors that drive team participation in surgical safety checks: a prospective study.
Article in Patient safety in surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Teamwork and implementation of innovations in healthcare and human service settings: a systematic review.Implementation science : IS · 2024Pooled it
- Does the Surgical Safety Checklist need a co-pilot? Comparing adherence in gynecological surgery through electronic medical records and OR Black Box video observations.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Observational
- Developing Implementation Strategies for the Adoption of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocols: A Co-Design Study.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025Article
- Healthcare professionals' perception of the World Health Organization Surgical Safety Checklist and psychological safety: a cross-sectional survey.BMJ open quality · 2024Article
- The Association between Operating Room Nurses' Characteristics, Competence, and Missed Nursing Care: A National Survey.Journal of nursing management · 2023Article
- Improving patient safety during intrahospital transportation of mechanically ventilated patients with critical illness.BMJ open quality · 2020Article
- How does the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist fit with existing perioperative risk management strategies? An ethnographic study across surgical specialties.BMC health services research · 2020Article
- Using normalisation process theory to evaluate the implementation of a complex intervention to embed the surgical safety checklist.BMC health services research · 2018Article
- Evaluation of a patient safety programme on Surgical Safety Checklist Compliance: a prospective longitudinal study.BMJ open quality · 2018Article
- Reality check of using the surgical safety checklist: A qualitative study to observe application errors during snapshot audits.PloS one · 2018Article
- Changes in safety climate and teamwork in the operating room after implementation of a revised WHO checklist: a prospective interventional study.Patient safety in surgery · 2017Article
- Why do surgeons continue to perform unnecessary surgery?Patient safety in surgery · 2017Article
- Variation and adaptation: learning from success in patient safety-oriented simulation training.Advances in simulation (London, England) · 2017Article
- Unlocking the "black box" of practice improvement strategies to implement surgical safety checklists: a process evaluation.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2017Article
- Advancing research on teams and team effectiveness in implementation science: An application of the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework.Implementation research and practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTeam-based group communications using checklists are widely advocated to achieve shared understandings and improve patient safety. Despite the positive effect checklists have on collaborations and reduced postoperative complications, their use has not been straightforward. Previous research has described contextual factors that impact on the implementation of checklists, however there is limited understanding of the issues that impede team participation in checklist use in surgery. The aim of this prospective study was to identify and describe factors that drive team participation in safety checks in surgery.
methodsWe observed ten surgical teams and conducted 33 semi-structured interviews with 70 participants from nursing, surgery and anaesthetics, and the community. Constant comparative methods were used to analyse textual data derived from field notes and interviews. Observational and interview data were collected during 2014-15.
resultsAnalysis of the textual data generated from the field notes and interviews revealed the extent to which members of the surgical team participated in using the surgical safety checklist during each phase of patient care. These three categories included: 'using the checklist'; 'working independently'; and, 'communicating checks with others'. The phases in the checking process most vulnerable to information loss or omission were sign in and sign out.
conclusionsTeam participation in safety checks depends on a convergence of intertwined factors; namely, team attributes, communication strategies and checking processes. A whole-of-team approach to participation in surgical safety checks is far more complex when considering the factors that drive participation. Strategies to increase participation in safety checks need to target professional communication practices and work processes such as workflow which curtail team members' ability to participate.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.