Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26793234›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2015

Assembly, Assessment, and Availability of De novo Generated Eukaryotic Transcriptomes.

Joanna Moreton, Abril Izquierdo, Richard D Emes

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. RNA sequencing least shrew (Frontiers in genetics · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A Comprehensive Guide to Potato Transcriptome Assembly.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  7. Modern Approaches for Transcriptome Analyses in Plants.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multi-tissue transcriptomes of caecilian amphibians highlight incomplete knowledge of vertebrate gene families.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2019
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Assessment of an Organ-SpecificG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Joanna MoretonAdvanced Data Analysis Centre, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of NottinghamLeicestershire, UK; School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of NottinghamLeicestershire, UK.
Abril IzquierdoSchool of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of Nottingham Leicestershire, UK.
Richard D EmesAdvanced Data Analysis Centre, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of NottinghamLeicestershire, UK; School of Veterinary Medicine and Science, Sutton Bonington Campus, University of NottinghamLeicestershire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

De novo assembly of a complete transcriptome without the need for a guiding reference genome is attractive, particularly where the cost and complexity of generating a eukaryote genome is prohibitive. The transcriptome should not however be seen as just a quick and cheap alternative to building a complete genome. Transcriptomics allows the understanding and comparison of spatial and temporal samples within an organism, and allows surveying of multiple individuals or closely related species. De novo assembly in theory allows the building of a complete transcriptome without any prior knowledge of the genome. It also allows the discovery of alternate splice forms of coding RNAs and also non-coding RNAs, which are often missed by proteomic approaches, or are incompletely annotated in genome studies. The limitations of the method are that the generation of a truly complete assembly is unlikely, and so we require some methods for the assessment of the quality and appropriateness of a generated transcriptome. Whilst no single consensus pipeline or tool is agreed as optimal, various algorithms, and easy to use software do exist making transcriptome generation a more common approach. With this expansion of data, questions still exist relating to how do we make these datasets fully discoverable, comparable and most useful to understand complex biological systems?

Indexed as

annotationassessmentavailabilityde novo transcriptome assemblyhigh-throughput sequencing

Identifiers

PMID26793234
PMCPMC4707302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.