Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26793218›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Genotypic Variation in Growth and Physiological Response to Drought Stress and Re-Watering Reveals the Critical Role of Recovery in Drought Adaptation in Maize Seedlings.

Daoqian Chen, Shiwen Wang, Beibei Cao, Dan Cao, Guohui Leng, Hongbing Li, Lina Yin, Lun Shan, Xiping Deng

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
49.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 344 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Drought Stress Mediated Changes in Food Crops: Mechanisms and Remediation Strategies.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Integrated Physiological and Transcriptome Analyses of Wild Jujube (International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Daoqian ChenState Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F UniversityYangling, China; College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F UniversityYangling, China.
Shiwen WangState Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F UniversityYangling, China; College of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F UniversityYangling, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water ResourcesYangling, China.
Beibei CaoCollege of Natural Resources and Environment, Northwest A&F University Yangling, China.
Dan CaoInstitute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water Resources Yangling, China.
Guohui LengBeijing Zhongnong Chuangyou Seed Technology Corporation Limited Beijing, China.
Hongbing LiState Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F UniversityYangling, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water ResourcesYangling, China.
Lina YinState Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F UniversityYangling, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water ResourcesYangling, China.
Lun ShanState Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F UniversityYangling, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water ResourcesYangling, China.
Xiping DengState Key Laboratory of Soil Erosion and Dryland Farming on the Loess Plateau, Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Northwest A&F UniversityYangling, China; College of Life Sciences, Northwest A&F UniversityYangling, China; Institute of Soil and Water Conservation, Chinese Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Water ResourcesYangling, China.
Chinese Academy of Sciences · CNNorthwest A&F University · CNInstitute of Soil and Water Conservation · CNMinistry of Water Resources of the People's Republic of China · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-irrigated crops in temperate climates and irrigated crops in arid climates are subjected to continuous cycles of water stress and re-watering. Thus, fast and efficient recovery from water stress may be among the key determinants of plant drought adaptation. The present study was designed to comparatively analyze the roles of drought resistance and drought recovery in drought adaptation and to investigate the physiological basis of genotypic variation in drought adaptation in maize (Zea mays) seedlings. As the seedlings behavior in growth associate with yield under drought, it could partly reflect the potential of drought adaptability. Growth and physiological responses to progressive drought stress and recovery were observed in seedlings of 10 maize lines. The results showed that drought adaptability is closely related to drought recovery (r = 0.714(**)), but not to drought resistance (r = 0.332). Drought induced decreases in leaf water content, water potential, osmotic potential, gas exchange parameters, chlorophyll content, Fv/Fm and nitrogen content, and increased H2O2 accumulation and lipid peroxidation. After recovery, most of these physiological parameters rapidly returned to normal levels. The physiological responses varied between lines. Further correlation analysis indicated that the physiological bases of drought resistance and drought recovery are definitely different, and that maintaining higher chlorophyll content (r = 0.874(***)) and Fv/Fm (r = 0.626(*)) under drought stress contributes to drought recovery. Our results suggest that both drought resistance and recovery are key determinants of plant drought adaptation, and that drought recovery may play a more important role than previously thought. In addition, leaf water potential, chlorophyll content and Fv/Fm could be used as efficient reference indicators in the selection of drought-adaptive genotypes.

Indexed as

drought adaptationdrought recoverydrought resistancegenotypic variationmaize

Identifiers

PMID26793218
PMCPMC4709455
OpenAlexW2275031385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.