Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26793197›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2015

Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Bone Marrow CD8(+) T Cells from Different Bones Uncovers a Major Contribution of the Bone Marrow in the Vertebrae.

Sulima Geerman, Sarah Hickson, Giso Brasser, Maria Fernanda Pascutti, Martijn A Nolte

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. [Communications biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. The Effects of Sclerostin on the Immune System.Current osteoporosis reports · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Memory CD8Haematologica · 2018
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sulima GeermanDepartment of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Sarah HicksonDepartment of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Giso BrasserDepartment of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Maria Fernanda PascuttiDepartment of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
Martijn A NolteDepartment of Hematopoiesis, Sanquin Research, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
University of Amsterdam · NLAcademic Medical Center · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone marrow (BM) plays an important role in the long-term maintenance of memory T cells. Yet, BM is found in numerous bones throughout the body, which are not equal in structure, as they differ in their ratio of cortical and trabecular bone. This implies that BM cells within different bones are subjected to different microenvironments, possibly leading to differences in their frequencies and function. To address this, we examined BM from murine tibia, femur, pelvis, sternum, radius, humerus, calvarium, and the vertebrae and analyzed the presence of effector memory (TEM), central memory (TCM), and naïve (TNV) CD8(+) T cells. During steady-state conditions, the frequency of the total CD8(+) T cell population was comparable between all bones. Interestingly, most CD8(+) T cells were located in the vertebrae, as it contained the highest amount of BM cells. Furthermore, the frequencies of TEM, TCM, and TNV cells were similar between all bones, with a majority of TNV cells. Additionally, CD8(+) T cells collected from different bones similarly expressed the key survival receptors IL-7Rα and IL-15Rβ. We also examined BM for memory CD8(+) T cells with a tissue-resident memory phenotype and observed that approximately half of all TEM cells expressed the retention marker CD69. Remarkably, in the memory phase of acute infection with the lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus (LCMV), we found a massive compositional change in the BM CD8(+) T cell population, as the TEM cells became the dominant subset at the cost of TNV cells. Analysis of Ki-67 expression established that these TEM cells were in a quiescent state. Finally, we detected higher frequencies of LCMV-specific CD8(+) T cells in BM compared to spleen and found that BM in its entirety contained fivefold more LCMV-specific CD8(+) T cells. In conclusion, although infection with LCMV caused a dramatic change in the BM CD8(+) T cell population, this did not result in noticeable differences between BM collected from different bones. Our findings suggest that in respect to CD8(+) T cells, BM harvested from a single bone is a fair reflection of the rest of the BM present in the murine body.

Indexed as

bone marrowCD69CD8+ T cellsKi-67LCMVmemorytissue-residentvertebrae

Identifiers

PMID26793197
PMCPMC4710685
OpenAlexW2235178011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.