Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26793161›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2015

Detecting Temporal Change in Dynamic Sounds: On the Role of Stimulus Duration, Speed, and Emotion.

Annett Schirmer, Nicolas Escoffier, Xiaoqin Cheng, Yenju Feng, Trevor B Penney

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Interactional synchrony: signals, mechanisms and benefits.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Temporal signatures of processing voiceness and emotion in sound.Social cognitive and affective neuroscience · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Annett SchirmerDepartment of Psychology, National University of Singapore, SingaporeSingapore; Life Sciences Institute Programme in Neurobiology and Ageing, National University of Singapore, SingaporeSingapore; Duke-NUS Graduate Medical School, SingaporeSingapore.
Nicolas EscoffierDepartment of Psychology, National University of Singapore, SingaporeSingapore; Life Sciences Institute Programme in Neurobiology and Ageing, National University of Singapore, SingaporeSingapore.
Xiaoqin ChengLife Sciences Institute Programme in Neurobiology and Ageing, National University of Singapore, SingaporeSingapore; Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering, National University of Singapore, SingaporeSingapore.
Yenju FengLife Sciences Institute Programme in Neurobiology and Ageing, National University of Singapore, SingaporeSingapore; Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and Engineering, National University of Singapore, SingaporeSingapore.
Trevor B PenneyDepartment of Psychology, National University of Singapore, SingaporeSingapore; Life Sciences Institute Programme in Neurobiology and Ageing, National University of Singapore, SingaporeSingapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For dynamic sounds, such as vocal expressions, duration often varies alongside speed. Compared to longer sounds, shorter sounds unfold more quickly. Here, we asked whether listeners implicitly use this confound when representing temporal regularities in their environment. In addition, we explored the role of emotions in this process. Using a mismatch negativity (MMN) paradigm, we asked participants to watch a silent movie while passively listening to a stream of task-irrelevant sounds. In Experiment 1, one surprised and one neutral vocalization were compressed and stretched to create stimuli of 378 and 600 ms duration. Stimuli were presented in four blocks, two of which used surprised and two of which used neutral expressions. In one surprised and one neutral block, short and long stimuli served as standards and deviants, respectively. In the other two blocks, the assignment of standards and deviants was reversed. We observed a climbing MMN-like negativity shortly after deviant onset, which suggests that listeners implicitly track sound speed and detect speed changes. Additionally, this MMN-like effect emerged earlier and was larger for long than short deviants, suggesting greater sensitivity to duration increments or slowing down than to decrements or speeding up. Last, deviance detection was facilitated in surprised relative to neutral blocks, indicating that emotion enhances temporal processing. Experiment 2 was comparable to Experiment 1 with the exception that sounds were spectrally rotated to remove vocal emotional content. This abolished the emotional processing benefit, but preserved the other effects. Together, these results provide insights into listener sensitivity to sound speed and raise the possibility that speed biases duration judgements implicitly in a feed-forward manner. Moreover, this bias may be amplified for duration increments relative to decrements and within an emotional relative to a neutral stimulus context.

Indexed as

auditory change detectionevent-related potentialsinterval timingpreattentiveprosodysex differencesvocal affect

Identifiers

PMID26793161
PMCPMC4710701

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.