Are Human Digit Muscles Devoid of Recurrent Inhibition?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Spatial and Temporal Arrangement of Recurrent Inhibition in the Primate Upper Limb.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2021
   Article
2. Unlike voluntary contractions, stimulated contractions of a hand muscle do not reduce voluntary activation or motoneuronal excitability.Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985) · 2020
   Article
3. Escape from homeostasis: spinal microcircuits and progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.Journal of neurophysiology · 2018
   Review

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as