Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26793016›Full record

ReviewContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2015

Treatment of neuroendocrine tumors: new recommendations based on the CLARINET study.

Beata Kos-Kudła

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Management of Ileal Neuroendocrine Tumors with Liver Metastases.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2020
    Article
  7. Soft Tissue Primary Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Case Report.The American journal of case reports · 2018
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Management of the hormonal syndrome of neuroendocrine tumors.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2017
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Beata Kos-KudłaDivision of Endocrinology, Department of Pathophysiology and Endocrinology, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.
Medical University of Silesia · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Somatostatin analogs (SSAs), including lanreotide, play a fundamental role in treatment of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the gastrointestinal tract. SSAs control the clinical symptoms and are the treatment of choice in functioning NETs. Data indicating that SSAs have anti-proliferative activity has mainly come from prospective or retrospective observational studies. A recently published CLARINET study confirmed the anti-proliferative effect of lanreotide in a much broader range of NET patients than previously reported. As a result, it is now possible for clinicians to use lanreotide to treat patients with well-differentiated metastatic grade 1 and grade 2 GEP NETs (i.e., with a Ki-67 proliferative index < 10%) located in the pancreas, small intestine, or of unknown primary location, regardless of the degree of liver involvement. The results of the CLARINET study also challenge the current "wait and watch" strategy for NET treatment. Instead, it is proposed that SSAs are considered at an early stage of NET management, as already suggested by many organizations and scientific societies.

Indexed as

CLARINETlanreotideneuroendocrine tumorssomatostatin analogues

Identifiers

PMID26793016
PMCPMC4709401
OpenAlexW2319722488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.