Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26792843›Full record

ArticleVeterinary pathology2016

The Vital Role of Pathology in Improving Reproducibility and Translational Relevance of Aging Studies in Rodents.

P M Treuting, J M Snyder, Y Ikeno, P N Schofield, J M Ward, J P Sundberg

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. uPAR Immuno-PET in Pancreatic Cancer, Aging, and Chemotherapy-Induced Senescence.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Histopathologic Evaluation and Scoring of Viral Lung Infection.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

P M TreutingDepartment of Comparative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA treuting@uw.edu.
J M SnyderDepartment of Comparative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Y IkenoBarshop Institute and Department of Pathology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio; Research Service and Geriatric Research and Education Clinical Center, Audie L. Murphy VA Hospital, South Texas Veterans Health Care System, San Antonio, TX, USA.
P N SchofieldDepartment of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK The Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.
J M WardGlobal VetPathology, Montgomery Village, MD, USA.
J P SundbergThe Jackson Laboratory, Bar Harbor, ME, USA.

Funding

Shared Resource ManagementP30CA034196 · NCI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI Anna Karolina Palucka · 1985 to 2026
$61.9M
TRANSGENIC COREP30AG013319 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI JAMES FLOYD NELSON · 1995 to 2026
$30.6M
SPECIFICITY OF OXYGEN DNA DAMAGE AND MUTAGENESISP01AG001751 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI RABINOVITCH, PETER S · 1985 to 2021
$29.6M
University of Washington Nathan Shock Center of Excellence in the Basic Biology of AgingP30AG013280 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Michael MacCoss · 1995 to 2026
$27.1M
Shock Center for Aging Research at The Jackson Laborato*P30AG025707 · NIA · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI WOYCHIK, RICHARD P · 2005 to 2009
$4.1M
Laboratory Animal Medicine and Translational Research Training for VeterinariansR25OD010450 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI BRABB, THEA, IRITANI, BRIAN M · 2012 to 2015
$634k
Pathology of Mouse Models of Human DiseaseR13OD010920 · OD · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI SUNDBERG, JOHN PAUL · 2012 to 2021
$200k
Anti-aging and anti-cancer effects of thioredoxinsI01BX001023 · VA · SOUTH TEXAS VETERANS HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI IKENO, YUJI · 2012 to 2015
–
BLRD VA I01 BX001023NCI NIH HHS CA34196NCI NIH HHS P30 CA034196NIA NIH HHS AG13319NIA NIH HHS AG25707NIA NIH HHS P01 AG001751NIA NIH HHS P01AG01751NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013280NIA NIH HHS P30AG013280NIA NIH HHS P30 AG013319NIA NIH HHS P30 AG025707NIH HHS R13 OD010920NIH HHS R25 OD010450NIH HHS R25OD010450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathology is a discipline of medicine that adds great benefit to aging studies of rodents by integrating in vivo, biochemical, and molecular data. It is not possible to diagnose systemic illness, comorbidities, and proximate causes of death in aging studies without the morphologic context provided by histopathology. To date, many rodent aging studies do not utilize end points supported by systematic necropsy and histopathology, which leaves studies incomplete, contradictory, and difficult to interpret. As in traditional toxicity studies, if the effect of a drug, dietary treatment, or altered gene expression on aging is to be studied, systematic pathology analysis must be included to determine the causes of age-related illness, moribundity, and death. In this Commentary, the authors discuss the factors that should be considered in the design of aging studies in mice, with the inclusion of robust pathology practices modified after those developed by toxicologic and discovery research pathologists. Investigators in the field of aging must consider the use of histopathology in their rodent aging studies in this era of integrative and preclinical geriatric science (geroscience).

Indexed as

AgingAnimalsCause of DeathCross-Sectional StudiesGene Expression RegulationLongevityMiceModels, AnimalPathologyReproducibility of ResultsResearch Designaginganimal modelcause of deathhealth spanhistopathologylife spanlongevitymouse modelnecropsypathologyrodent

Identifiers

PMID26792843
PMCPMC4835687

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.