Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26792536›Full record

ReviewArchives of biochemistry and biophysics2016

Computational crystallization.

Irem Altan, Patrick Charbonneau, Edward H Snell

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Archives of biochemistry and biophysics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Irem AltanDepartment of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Patrick CharbonneauDepartment of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA; Department of Physics, Duke University, Durham, NC 27708, USA.
Edward H SnellHauptman-Woodward Medical Research Institute, 700 Ellicott St., NY 14203, USA; Department of Structural Biology, SUNY University of Buffalo, 700 Ellicott St., NY 14203, USA. Electronic address: esnell@hwi.buffalo.edu.

Funding

Development of an Expert Crystallization Knowledge SystemR01GM088396 · NIGMS · HAUPTMAN-WOODWARD MEDICAL RESEARCH INST · PI SNELL, EDWARD H · 2010 to 2014
$1.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM088396
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crystallization is a key step in macromolecular structure determination by crystallography. While a robust theoretical treatment of the process is available, due to the complexity of the system, the experimental process is still largely one of trial and error. In this article, efforts in the field are discussed together with a theoretical underpinning using a solubility phase diagram. Prior knowledge has been used to develop tools that computationally predict the crystallization outcome and define mutational approaches that enhance the likelihood of crystallization. For the most part these tools are based on binary outcomes (crystal or no crystal), and the full information contained in an assembly of crystallization screening experiments is lost. The potential of this additional information is illustrated by examples where new biological knowledge can be obtained and where a target can be sub-categorized to predict which class of reagents provides the crystallization driving force. Computational analysis of crystallization requires complete and correctly formatted data. While massive crystallization screening efforts are under way, the data available from many of these studies are sparse. The potential for this data and the steps needed to realize this potential are discussed.

Indexed as

Models, MolecularComputer SimulationCrystallizationCrystallographyProtein ConformationProteinsProteinscomputationalCrystallizationcrystallization datacrystallographymacromolecular

Identifiers

PMID26792536
PMCPMC4909510

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.