Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26792494›Full record

ArticleBMC medical genomics2016

Machine learning derived risk prediction of anorexia nervosa.

Yiran Guo, Zhi Wei, Brendan J Keating, Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa, Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 3, Price Foundation Collaborative Group, Hakon Hakonarson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yiran GuoThe Center for Applied Genomics, Abramson Research Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. guoy@email.chop.edu.
Zhi WeiDepartment of Computer Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA.
Brendan J KeatingThe Center for Applied Genomics, Abramson Research Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa
Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 3
Price Foundation Collaborative Group
Hakon HakonarsonThe Center for Applied Genomics, Abramson Research Center, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA. hakonarson@email.chop.edu.

Funding

The Future of Genomics Medicine in Patient Care: Contributions from CHOPU01HG008684 · NHGRI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI HAKONARSON, HAKON · 2015 to 2019
$5.0M
Integrative Analysis of a GWAS Repository with EMRs from over 40,000 ChildrenU01HG006830 · NHGRI · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI HAKONARSON, HAKON · 2012 to 2014
$3.7M
Postdoctoral Research Training in Eating DisordersT32MH076694 · NIMH · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BULIK, CYNTHIA M · 2007 to 2016
$1.8M
Medical Research Council G0000934NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG006830NHGRI NIH HHS U01 HG008684NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH076694Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 068545/Z/02Wellcome Trust 076113/C/04/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAnorexia nervosa (AN) is a complex psychiatric disease with a moderate to strong genetic contribution. In addition to conventional genome wide association (GWA) studies, researchers have been using machine learning methods in conjunction with genomic data to predict risk of diseases in which genetics play an important role.

methodsIn this study, we collected whole genome genotyping data on 3940 AN cases and 9266 controls from the Genetic Consortium for Anorexia Nervosa (GCAN), the Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium 3 (WTCCC3), Price Foundation Collaborative Group and the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP), and applied machine learning methods for predicting AN disease risk. The prediction performance is measured by area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), indicating how well the model distinguishes cases from unaffected control subjects.

resultsLogistic regression model with the lasso penalty technique generated an AUC of 0.693, while Support Vector Machines and Gradient Boosted Trees reached AUC's of 0.691 and 0.623, respectively. Using different sample sizes, our results suggest that larger datasets are required to optimize the machine learning models and achieve higher AUC values.

conclusionsTo our knowledge, this is the first attempt to assess AN risk based on genome wide genotype level data. Future integration of genomic, environmental and family-based information is likely to improve the AN risk evaluation process, eventually benefitting AN patients and families in the clinical setting.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseMachine LearningAdolescentAdultAnorexia NervosaDatabases, GeneticFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsReproducibility of ResultsRisk FactorsSample Size

Identifiers

PMID26792494
PMCPMC4721143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.