ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2016
Assessing equity in benefit distribution of government health subsidy in 2012 across East China: benefit incidence analysis.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Benefit equity of social health insurance in China and its provinces (2014-2020): implications for universal health coverage.BMJ global health · 2024Article
- Article
- Inequity and benefit incidence analysis in healthcare use among Syrian refugees in Egypt.Conflict and health · 2021Article
- Benefit of China's Social Health Insurance Schemes: Trend Analysis and Associated Factors Since Health Reform.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021Article
- The distribution of benefits under China's new rural cooperative medical system: evidence from western rural China.International journal for equity in health · 2018Article
- Estimating benefit equity of government health subsidy in healthcare Services in Shandong Province, China: a cross-sectional study.International journal for equity in health · 2018Article
- Article
- The impacts of implementation of National Essential Medicines Policies on primary healthcare institutions: a cross-sectional study in China.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Equality in the distribution of health material and human resources in Guangxi: evidence from Southern China.BMC research notes · 2017Article
- Geographic distribution indices of general practitioners, midwives, pediatricians, and gynecologists in the public sector of Iran.Electronic physician · 2017Article
- Assessing equity in the distribution of high-technology medical equipment in Guangxi: evidence from an ethnic minority region in Southern China.International journal for equity in health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundImproving the equitable benefit distribution of government health subsidies, particularly among the country's poorer socioeconomic groups, is a major goal of China's healthcare sector reform.
methodsBenefit incidence analysis was employed to measure the distribution of government health subsidies by income quintile. The concentration index (CI) of different levels of health care facility in urban and rural areas was calculated. A household survey complete through multistage stratified sampling was conducted in 2013 in urban areas (16,908 respondents) and rural areas (19,525 respondents).
resultsThe overall CI for urban patients was 0.1068 for outpatient care and 0.1237 for inpatient care. For outpatient care, the CI was 0.0795, 0.0465 and 0.3456, respectively, at primary, secondary and tertiary health care facilities; for inpatient care, the CI was -0.2179, 0.0752 and 0.2883 at the corresponding facility levels. The overall CI for rural outpatients was -0.0659 and 0.0036 for inpatients. For outpatient care, the CI was -0.0818, 0.0567 and 0.0271 at primary, secondary and tertiary facilities, respectively; for inpatient care, the CI was -0.0050, 0.0084 and 0.0252 at the corresponding facility levels.
conclusionsChina's primary level health care facilities were found to have a more equitable benefit distribution of government health subsidies than the secondary- and tertiary- level facilities. Increased government budget allocations and insurance imbursement rates, and the provision of technical support and qualified medical staff to lower-level hospitals were key factors. However, the provision of equal subsidies to all socioeconomic levels was found to be a potential threat to the equity of government health subsidy distribution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.