Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26792072›Full record

ArticleRadiation oncology (London, England)2016

Second-line treatment of recurrent HNSCC: tumor debulking in combination with high-dose-rate brachytherapy and a simultaneous cetuximab-paclitaxel protocol.

M Ritter, I U Teudt, J E Meyer, U Schröder, G Kovács, B Wollenberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiation oncology (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Interventional radiotherapy (brachytherapy) for re-irradiation of recurrent head and neck malignancies: oncologic outcomes and morbidity.Acta otorhinolaryngologica Italica : organo ufficiale della Societa italiana di otorinolaringologia e chirurgia cervico-facciale · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Brachytherapy Approach UsingPharmaceutics · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

M RitterDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. matthias.ritter@uksh.de.
I U TeudtDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Asklepios Hospital Altona, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 1, 22763, Hamburg, Germany. i.teudt@asklepios.com.
J E MeyerDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Asklepios Hospital St.Georg, Lohmühlenstraße 5, 20099, Hamburg, Germany. jens.meyer@asklepios.com.
U SchröderDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. ursula.schroeder@uksh.de.
G KovácsInterdisziplinary Brachytherapy Unit, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. gyoergy.kovacs@uksh.de.
B WollenbergDepartment of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, Ratzeburger Allee 160, 23538, Lübeck, Germany. barbara.wollenberg@uksh.de.
University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein · DEAsklepios Klinik Altona · DEAsklepios Klinik St. Georg · DEUniversity of Lübeck · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeAfter the failure of first-line treatment, the clinical prognosis in head and neck cancer (HNSCC) deteriorates. Effective therapeutic strategies are limited due to the toxicity of previous treatments and the diminished tolerance of surrounding normal tissue. This study demonstrates a promising second-line regimen, with function preserving surgical tumor debulking, followed by a combination of postoperative interstitial brachytherapy and a simultaneous protocol of cetuximab and taxol. PATIENTS AND

methodsFrom January 2006 to May 2013, 197 patients with HNSCC were treated with brachytherapy at the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Lübeck, including 94 patients due to recurrent cancer. Within these, 18 patients were referred to our clinic because of early progressive disease following first- or second-line treatment failure. They received the new palliative regimen. A matched-pair analysis including recurrent tumor stage, status of resection margins, tissue invasion and previous therapy was performed to evaluate this treatment retrospectively. Overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), functional outcome and treatment toxicity was analyzed on the basis of medical records and follow-up data.

resultsDFS and OS of the study group were 8.7 and 14.8 months. Whereas, DFS and OS of the control group, treated only by function preserving tumor debulking and brachytherapy, was 3.9 and 6.1 months respectively. This demonstrates a positive trend through the additional use of the cetuximab-taxane protocol. Furthermore, no increase of therapy induced toxicities was displayed.

conclusionPre-treated patients with a further relapse benefit from the 'cetuximab-taxane recurrency scheme'. It seems to be a valuable complement to interdisciplinary and multimodal tumor therapy, which improves OS and results in acceptable toxicity.

Indexed as

AgedBrachytherapyCarcinoma, Squamous CellCetuximabCytoreduction Surgical ProceduresDisease-Free SurvivalDisease ProgressionFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPaclitaxelPalliative CarePrognosisRetrospective StudiesCetuximabPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID26792072
PMCPMC4719334
OpenAlexW2278699443

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.