Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26792057›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Using Participatory Learning & Action research to access and engage with 'hard to reach' migrants in primary healthcare research.

Mary O'Reilly-de Brún, Tomas de Brún, Ekaterina Okonkwo, Jean-Samuel Bonsenge-Bokanga, Maria Manuela De Almeida Silva, Florence Ogbebor, Aga Mierzejewska, Lovina Nnadi, Evelyn van Weel-Baumgarten, Chris van Weel and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Results and Strategies for a Diversity-Oriented Public Health Monitoring in Germany.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Black and minority ethnic group involvement in health and social care research: A systematic review.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Patient influence on general practice service improvement decision making: a participatory research mixed-methods intervention study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Refugee and migrants' involvement in participatory spaces in a US practice-based research network study: Responding to unanticipated priorities.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2023
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Mary O'Reilly-de BrúnDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland. mary.oreillydebrun@nuigalway.ie.
Tomas de BrúnDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Ekaterina OkonkwoDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Jean-Samuel Bonsenge-BokangaDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Maria Manuela De Almeida SilvaDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Florence OgbeborDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Aga MierzejewskaDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Lovina NnadiDiscipline of General Practice, School of Medicine, National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland.
Evelyn van Weel-BaumgartenDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Chris van WeelDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Maria van den MuijsenberghDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Anne MacFarlaneGraduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommunication problems occur in general practice consultations when migrants and general practitioners do not share a common language and culture. Migrants' perspectives have rarely been included in the development of guidelines designed to ameliorate this. Considered 'hard-to-reach' on the basis of inaccessibility, language discordance and cultural difference, migrants have been consistently excluded from participation in primary healthcare research. The purpose of this qualitative study was to address this gap.

methodsThe study was conducted in the Republic of Ireland, 2009 - 2011. We developed a multi-lingual community-university research team that included seven established migrants from local communities. They completed training in Participatory Learning & Action (PLA) - a qualitative research methodology. Then, as trained service-user peer researchers (SUPERs) they used their access routes, language skills, cultural knowledge and innovative PLA techniques to recruit and engage in research with fifty-one hard-to-reach migrant service-users (MSUs). RESULTS & DISCUSSION: In terms of access, university researchers successfully accessed SUPERs, who, in turn, successfully accessed, recruited and retained MSUs in the study. In terms of meaningful engagement, SUPERs facilitated a complex PLA research process in a language-concordant manner, enabling inclusion and active participation by MSUs. This ensured that MSUs' perspectives were included in the development of a guideline for improving communication between healthcare providers and MSUs in Ireland. SUPERs evaluated their experiences of capacity-building, training, research fieldwork and dissemination as positively meaningful for them. MSUs evaluated their experiences of engagement in PLA fieldwork and research as positively meaningful for them.

conclusionsGiven the need to build primary healthcare 'from the ground up', the perspectives of diverse groups, especially the hard-to-reach, must become a normative part of primary healthcare research. PLA is a powerful, practical 'fit-for-purpose' methodology for achieving this: enabling hard-to-reach groups to engage meaningfully and contribute with ease to academic research. PLA has significant potential to become a 'standard' or generic approach in building community-based primary health care. Community-university partnerships have a significant role to play in this, with capacity to radically influence the shape of healthcare research, expanding the research agenda to incorporate the views and needs of hard-to-reach and vulnerable populations.

Indexed as

Primary Health CareTransients and MigrantsAdultCommunicationCommunity Health ServicesFemaleGeneral PracticeHealth Services ResearchHumansIrelandMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchReferral and ConsultationResearch PersonnelResidence Characteristics

Identifiers

PMID26792057
PMCPMC4721015

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.