Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26791956›Full record

ArticleSystematic reviews2016

Relationship between socioeconomic status and gastrointestinal infections in developed countries: a systematic review protocol.

Tanith C Rose, Natalie Adams, David C Taylor-Robinson, Benjamin Barr, Jeremy Hawker, Sarah O'Brien, Mara Violato, Margaret Whitehead

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Systematic reviews, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Tanith C RoseNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK. Tanith.Rose@liverpool.ac.uk.
Natalie AdamsNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK. Natalie.Adams@phe.gov.uk.
David C Taylor-RobinsonNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK. David.Taylor-Robinson@liverpool.ac.uk.
Benjamin BarrNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK. B.Barr@liverpool.ac.uk.
Jeremy HawkerNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK. Jeremy.Hawker@phe.gov.uk.
Sarah O'BrienNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK. S.J.Obrien@liverpool.ac.uk.
Mara ViolatoNIHR Health Protections Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. mara.violato@dph.ox.ac.uk.
Margaret WhiteheadNIHR Health Protection Research Unit in Gastrointestinal Infections, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, L69 7BE, UK. mmw@liverpool.ac.uk.
University of Liverpool · GBHealth Protection Research Unit in Emerging and Zoonotic Infections at University of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Oxford · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0802448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe association between low socioeconomic status (SES) and poor health is well documented in the existing literature. Nonetheless, evidence on the relationship between SES and gastrointestinal (GI) infections is limited, and the mechanisms underlying this relationship are not well understood with published studies pointing to conflicting results. This review aims to identify studies that investigate the relationship between SES and GI infections in developed countries, in order to assess the direction of the association and explore possible explanations for any differences in the risk, incidence or prevalence of GI infections across socioeconomic groups.

methodsThree systematic methods will be used to identify relevant literature: electronic database, reference list and grey literature searching. The databases MEDLINE, Scopus and Web of Science Core Collection will be searched using a broad range of search terms. Screening of the results will be performed by two reviewers using pre-defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The reference lists of included studies will be searched, and Google will be used to identify grey literature. Observational studies reporting quantitative results on the prevalence or incidence of any symptomatic GI infections by SES, in a representative population sample from a member country of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), will be included. Data will be extracted using a standardised form. Study quality will be assessed using the Liverpool University Quality Assessment Tools (LQAT). A narrative synthesis will be performed including tabulation of studies for comparison. DISCUSSION: This systematic review will consolidate the existing knowledge on the relationship between SES and GI infections. The results will help to identify gaps in the literature and will therefore provide an evidence base for future empirical studies to deepen the understanding of the relationship, including effective study design and appropriate data analysis methods. Ultimately, gaining insight into this relationship will help to inform policies to reduce any health inequalities identified. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42015027231.

Indexed as

Developed CountriesHealth Status DisparitiesSocial ClassGastrointestinal DiseasesHumansInfectionsSocioeconomic FactorsSystematic Reviews as Topic

Identifiers

PMID26791956
PMCPMC4721014
OpenAlexW2254254175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.