ArticleJournal of proteome research2016
Universal Solid-Phase Reversible Sample-Prep for Concurrent Proteome and N-Glycome Characterization.
Article in Journal of proteome research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Characterizing Patients with Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections in Vesicoureteral Reflux: A Pilot Study of the Urinary Proteome.Molecular & cellular proteomics : MCP · 2020Article
- Analytical Scheme Leading to Integrated High-Sensitivity Profiling of Glycosphingolipids Together with N- and O-Glycans from One Sample.Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry · 2018Article
- Recent Advances in the Analysis of Complex Glycoproteins.Analytical chemistry · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
We describe a novel solid-phase reversible sample-prep (SRS) platform that enables rapid sample preparation for concurrent proteome and N-glycome characterization for nearly all protein samples. SRS utilizes a uniquely functionalized, silica-based bead that has strong affinity toward proteins with minimal to no affinity for peptides and other small molecules. By leveraging this inherent size difference between proteins and peptides, SRS permits high-capacity binding of proteins, rapid removal of small molecules (detergents, metabolites, salts, peptides, etc.), extensive manipulation including enzymatic and chemical treatments on bead-bound proteins, and easy recovery of N-glycans and peptides. SRS was evaluated in a wide range of samples including glycoproteins, cell lysate, murine tissues, and human urine. SRS was also coupled to a quantitative strategy to investigate the differences between DU145 prostate cancer cells and its DIAPH3-silenced counterpart. Previous studies suggested that DIAPH3 silencing in DU145 induced transition to an amoeboid phenotype that correlated with tumor progression and metastasis. In this pilot study we identified distinct proteomic and N-glycomic alterations between them. A metastasis-associated tyrosine kinase receptor ephrin-type-A receptor (EPHA2) was highly up-regulated in DIAPH3-silenced cells, indicating a possible connection between EPHA2 and DIAPH3. Moreover, distinct alterations in the N-glycome were identified, suggesting cross-links between DIAPH3 and glycosyltransferase networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.