Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26791200›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2016

Rich-Club Organization in Effective Connectivity among Cortical Neurons.

Sunny Nigam, Masanori Shimono, Shinya Ito, Fang-Chin Yeh, Nicholas Timme, Maxym Myroshnychenko, Christopher C Lapish, Zachary Tosi, Pawel Hottowy, Wesley C Smith and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 84 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
84citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

84 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. An integratediScience · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Neural network embedding of functional microconnectome.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

24 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Sunny NigamDepartment of Physics and nigams@indiana.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1559-5556
Masanori ShimonoDepartment of Physics and.
Shinya ItoSanta Cruz Institute for Particle Physics, University of California at Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, California 95064.
Fang-Chin YehDuke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, Department of Neuroscience and Behavioural Disorders, Singapore 169857.
Nicholas TimmeDepartment of Physics and.
Maxym MyroshnychenkoProgram in Neuroscience, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47405.
Christopher C LapishSchool of Science Institute for Mathematical Modeling and Computational Sciences, Indiana University-Purdue University, Indianapolis, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202.
Zachary TosiSchool of Informatics and Computing, College of Arts and Sciences, and.
Pawel HottowyPhysics and Applied Computer Science, AGH University of Science and Technology, 30-059 Krakow, Poland, and.
Wesley C SmithDepartment of Neurobiology and.
Sotiris C MasmanidisCalifornia NanoSystems Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California 90095.
Alan M LitkeDuke-NUS Graduate Medical School Singapore, Department of Neuroscience and Behavioural Disorders, Singapore 169857.
Olaf SpornsDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana 47401.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7265-4036
John M BeggsDepartment of Physics and.

Funding

Prefrontal cortex regulation of ethanol-reinforced behaviorR01AA023786 · NIAAA · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI LAPISH, CHRISTOPHER COURT · 2015 to 2019
$1.7M
Systems-level electrophysiology for addiction and reward researchR01DA034178 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI MASMANIDIS, SOTIRIS · 2012 to 2016
$1.5M
NIAAA NIH HHS R01 AA023786NIDA NIH HHS 5R01-DA-034178-03NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA034178
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The performance of complex networks, like the brain, depends on how effectively their elements communicate. Despite the importance of communication, it is virtually unknown how information is transferred in local cortical networks, consisting of hundreds of closely spaced neurons. To address this, it is important to record simultaneously from hundreds of neurons at a spacing that matches typical axonal connection distances, and at a temporal resolution that matches synaptic delays. We used a 512-electrode array (60 μm spacing) to record spontaneous activity at 20 kHz from up to 500 neurons simultaneously in slice cultures of mouse somatosensory cortex for 1 h at a time. We applied a previously validated version of transfer entropy to quantify information transfer. Similar to in vivo reports, we found an approximately lognormal distribution of firing rates. Pairwise information transfer strengths also were nearly lognormally distributed, similar to reports of synaptic strengths. Some neurons transferred and received much more information than others, which is consistent with previous predictions. Neurons with the highest outgoing and incoming information transfer were more strongly connected to each other than chance, thus forming a "rich club." We found similar results in networks recorded in vivo from rodent cortex, suggesting the generality of these findings. A rich-club structure has been found previously in large-scale human brain networks and is thought to facilitate communication between cortical regions. The discovery of a small, but information-rich, subset of neurons within cortical regions suggests that this population will play a vital role in communication, learning, and memory. Significance statement: Many studies have focused on communication networks between cortical brain regions. In contrast, very few studies have examined communication networks within a cortical region. This is the first study to combine such a large number of neurons (several hundred at a time) with such high temporal resolution (so we can know the direction of communication between neurons) for mapping networks within cortex. We found that information was not transferred equally through all neurons. Instead, ∼70% of the information passed through only 20% of the neurons. Network models suggest that this highly concentrated pattern of information transfer would be both efficient and robust to damage. Therefore, this work may help in understanding how the cortex processes information and responds to neurodegenerative diseases.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornMiceMice, Inbred C57BLNerve NetNeuronsOrgan Culture TechniquesSomatosensory Cortexeffective connectivityinformation transfermicrocircuitsrich clubtransfer entropy

Identifiers

PMID26791200
PMCPMC4719009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.