Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26791183›Full record

ReviewThe American journal of clinical nutrition2016

Development of infant oral feeding skills: what do we know?

Chantal Lau

3 registry-linked trialsAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 3 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 79 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
79citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03755999 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

A Cue-based Developmental Approach Toward the Preterm Infants During Feeding Transition Period - Explore Clinical Facts, Evaluate Intervention Effects and Develop Clinical Guideline

TypeinterventionalSponsorNational Cheng-Kung University HospitalRan2018 to 2023Enrolled120ConditionsPreterm Infant, Feeding Behavior, Feeding PatternsArmsThe premature infant oral motor intervention (PIOMI)
NCT04400175 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Effects on Coordination of Sucking, Swallowing and Breathing Process of a Valved Feeding System in Late-preterm Newborns. The Safe Oral Feeding Trial (SOFT)

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Turin, ItalyRan2020 to 2023Enrolled40ConditionsPremature Birth, Feeding, Difficult, Newborn, Feeding, BottleArmsValved ergonomic teat, Standard silicon teat
NCT07632066 completednot on this map

Early Evolution of Oral Feeding Skills in Very Preterm Infants: Impact of an Oral Stimulation Program Assessed by Cot-side Suckometer

TypeobservationalSponsorHôpital de la Croix-RousseRan2012 to 2013Enrolled17ConditionsPrematurity, Extreme, Feeding DifficultiesArmsBedside Suckometer, Structured Oral Stimulation Protocol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

79 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Guideline
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Optimal Timing to Utilize Olfactory Stimulation with Maternal Breast Milk to Improve Oral Feeding Skills in the Premature Newborn.Breastfeeding medicine : the official journal of the Academy of Breastfeeding Medicine · 2019
    Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Randomized trial of earlier versus later oral feeding in very premature infants.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Predicting the future for neonates with symptomatic congenital heart disease.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Article
  20. Article

19 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Chantal LauDepartment of Pediatrics/Neonatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX clau@bcm.edu.

Funding

Oral Feeding in InfantsR01HD044469 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI LAU, CHANTAL · 2005 to 2009
$1.7M
FEEDING STRATEGIES FOR LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTSR01HD028140 · NICHD · BAYLOR COLLEGE OF MEDICINE · PI SCHANLER, RICHARD J. · 1992 to 2000
$380k
NCRR NIH HHS 1RR000188NICHD NIH HHS HD 044469NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD 28140
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The hospital discharge of premature infants in neonatal intensive care units is often delayed due to their inability to feed by mouth safely and competently. With immature physiologic functions, infants born prematurely cannot be expected to readily feed by mouth at the equivalent age of a third trimester of gestation as the majority of their term counterparts do. Consequently, it is crucial that health care professionals gain an adequate knowledge of the development of preterm infants' oral feeding skills so as to optimize their safety and competency as they transition to oral feeding. With a greater sensitivity toward their immature skills, we can offer these infants a safer and smoother transition to independent oral feeding than is currently observed. This review article is an overview of the evidence-based research undertaken over the past 2 decades on the development of very-low-birth-weight infants' oral feeding skills. The description of the different functional levels where these infants can encounter hurdles may assist caregivers in identifying a potential cause or causes for their individual patients' oral feeding difficulties.

Indexed as

Child DevelopmentEvidence-Based MedicineFeeding MethodsInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaPrecision MedicineCombined Modality TherapyCongresses as TopicFeeding and Eating Disorders of ChildhoodHumansInfant BehaviorInfant, NewbornInfant, Very Low Birth WeightNeurogenesisPractice Guidelines as TopicPremature BirthRespiratory Physiological Phenomenadysphagianeonatal intensive care unitNICUoral feeding issuesprematuritysuck-swallow-respiration coordination

Identifiers

PMID26791183
PMCPMC4733254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.