Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26791182›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of clinical nutrition2016

Working group reports: evaluation of the evidence to support practice guidelines for nutritional care of preterm infants-the Pre-B Project.

Daniel J Raiten, Alison L Steiber, Susan E Carlson, Ian Griffin, Diane Anderson, William W Hay, Sandra Robins, Josef Neu, Michael K Georgieff, Sharon Groh-Wargo and 2 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Feeding intolerance.Early human development · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Power of Networking and Lessons Learned From Omegaven.The journal of pediatric pharmacology and therapeutics : JPPT : the official journal of PPAG · 2020
    Article
  14. MACRONUTRIENTS OF MOTHERS' MILK OF VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTS: ANALYSIS ACCORDING TO GESTATIONAL AGE AND MATERNAL VARIABLES.Revista paulista de pediatria : orgao oficial da Sociedade de Pediatria de Sao Paulo · 2020
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Valid serial length measurements in preterm infants permit characterization of growth patterns.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2018
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Nutritional influences on brain development.Acta paediatrica (Oslo, Norway : 1992) · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Daniel J RaitenEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, NIH, Bethesda, MD; raitend@mail.nih.gov.
Alison L SteiberAcademy of Nutrition and Dietetics, Chicago, IL;
Susan E CarlsonUniversity of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, KS;
Ian GriffinUniversity of California-Davis, Davis, CA;
Diane AndersonBaylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX;
William W HayUniversity of Colorado, Aurora, CO;
Sandra RobinsFairfax Neonatal Associates at Inova Children's Hospital, Fairfax, VA;
Josef NeuUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL;
Michael K GeorgieffUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN;
Sharon Groh-WargoCase Western Reserve University-School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH; and.
Tanis R FentonUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Pre-B Consultative Working Groups

Funding

PILOT STUDY--SUBSTRATE METABOLISM IN EXTREMELY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT INFANTSP30DK048520 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Wendy M Kohrt · 1995 to 2026
$32.6M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The "Evaluation of the Evidence to Support Practice Guidelines for the Nutritional Care of Preterm Infants: The Pre-B Project" is the first phase in a process to present the current state of knowledge and to support the development of evidence-informed guidance for the nutritional care of preterm and high-risk newborn infants. The future systematic reviews that will ultimately provide the underpinning for guideline development will be conducted by the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics' Evidence Analysis Library (EAL). To accomplish the objectives of this first phase, the Pre-B Project organizers established 4 working groups (WGs) to address the following themes: 1) nutrient specifications for preterm infants, 2) clinical and practical issues in enteral feeding of preterm infants, 3) gastrointestinal and surgical issues, and 4) current standards of infant feeding. Each WG was asked to 1) develop a series of topics relevant to their respective themes, 2) identify questions for which there is sufficient evidence to support a systematic review process conducted by the EAL, and 3) develop a research agenda to address priority gaps in our understanding of the role of nutrition in health and development of preterm/neonatal intensive care unit infants. This article is a summary of the reports from the 4 Pre-B WGs.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionEvidence-Based MedicineInfant Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaParenteral NutritionPrecision MedicineBiomedical ResearchChild Nutrition SciencesCombined Modality TherapyCongresses as TopicGrowth DisordersHealth PrioritiesHumansInfant, NewbornNutritional RequirementsPractice Guidelines as TopicPremature Birthenteral nutritiongrowthnutrient requirementsparenteral nutritionpreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID26791182
PMCPMC6459074

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.