Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26791082›Full record

ArticleDiagnostic pathology2016

Occurrence and detection method evaluation of group B streptococcus from prenatal vaginal specimen in Northwest China.

Yun Xie, JunLan Yang, Peng Zhao, Hui Jia, Qi Wang

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostic pathology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Group BMicrobiology spectrum · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Yun XieDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Medical Laboratory Centre, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China. xieyunhero@sina.com.
JunLan YangDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Medical Laboratory Centre, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China. orchid77@sina.com.
Peng ZhaoColleges of Life Sciences, Northwest University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710069, China. pengzhao@nwu.edu.cn.
Hui JiaDepartment of Clinical Microbiology, Medical Laboratory Centre, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710061, China. Hui.Jia@163.com.
Qi WangDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, 710004, China. wangqi_bio@sina.com.
Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital · CNNorthwest University · CNSecond Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sensitive and efficient detection of Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonization in pregnant women is essential for prescription of prophylaxis at the time of delivery as GBS is an opportunistic pathogen known to cause infant mortality. In this report, two studies were conducted on the methods of GBS detection in Shaanxi province, China, a region lacking data for GBS detection and occurrence. For Study 1, 100 GBS culture-positive vaginal swabs were collected from 1,567 pregnant women for evaluation by direct latex agglutination test. In Study 2, 200 GBS vaginal swabs were evaluated by three culture methods (sheep blood agar (SBA), Columbia colistin-nalidixic agar (CNA), and selective carrot broth (SCB)) followed by analysis using a latex agglutination test. GBS was detected in 6.4 % of specimens in Study 1 and 10.5 % of specimens in Study 2. The results of the latex agglutination test in both studies were accurate with samples exhibiting high to moderate GBS growth, but the accuracy declined for samples with low GBS growth. The evaluation of culture methods for GBS detection revealed the sensitivity of SCB (95.2 %, p = 0.004) was significantly higher than that of the SBA medium (57.1 %). The sensitivity reported for SCB (95.2 %) was higher than CNA (76.0 %), but the difference was not statistically significant (p =0.078). These results indicate a selective broth, such as SCB, is ideal for accuracy at low growth levels, but a direct latex agglutination test could be used as an alternative for rapid detection of GBS in circumstances requiring immediate detection.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesLatex Fixation TestsChinaFemaleHumansInfectious Disease Transmission, VerticalPredictive Value of TestsPregnancyPregnancy Complications, InfectiousReproducibility of ResultsStreptococcal InfectionsStreptococcus agalactiaeVaginaVaginal Smears

Identifiers

PMID26791082
PMCPMC4721209
OpenAlexW2268971997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.