Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26790952›Full record

ArticleHealth and quality of life outcomes2016

Rasch analysis of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire among adults from South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand.

Lusilda Schutte, Marié P Wissing, Suria M Ellis, Paul E Jose, Dianne A Vella-Brodrick

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health and quality of life outcomes, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Well-Being Measurement in Africa: A Systematic Review.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lusilda SchutteAfrica Unit for Trans-disciplinary Health Research, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa. Lusilda.Schutte@nwu.ac.za.
Marié P WissingAfrica Unit for Trans-disciplinary Health Research, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa. Marie.Wissing@nwu.ac.za.
Suria M EllisStatistical Consultation Services, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa. Suria.Ellis@nwu.ac.za.
Paul E JoseSchool of Psychology, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand. Paul.Jose@vuw.ac.nz.
Dianne A Vella-BrodrickMelbourne Graduate School of Education, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. dianne.vella-brodrick@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMeaning in life is a key indicator of subjective well-being and quality of life. Further developments in understanding and enhancing the construct will depend inter alia on the sound measurement thereof. This study is at the forefront of applying modern psychometric techniques to the Meaning in Life Questionnaire, a scale widely used to assess meaning in life.

methodThe Rasch rating scale model was applied to the Presence and Search subscales of the Meaning in Life Questionnaire using a sample of 601 adults from South Africa, Australia, and New Zealand.

resultsThe Presence subscale was insensitive at high levels of presence of meaning while the majority of the respondents fell in that range. Removal of item 9 ("My life has no clear purpose") and collapsing the response categories indicative of low and medium levels of the latent construct significantly improved the subscale's targeting and fit to the Rasch model, resulting in a subscale that exhibited differential item functioning on items 1 ("I understand my life's meaning"), 4 ("My life has a clear sense of purpose"), and 5 ("I have a good sense of what makes my life meaningful") for country, but none for gender, age group, or education level. The Search subscale yielded disordered category threshold calibrations, but after collapsing some of the response categories representing low and medium levels of the target construct, a subscale that demonstrated good fit to the Rasch model, good targeting, and no differential item functioning resulted.

conclusionsIn terms of this particular scale, adaptation of the rating scale and removal of item 9 is recommended. Country-level parameter estimates may be needed for items that exhibited differential item functioning. The study also has significant implications for the theory, measurement, and practice of meaning in and quality of life in general. Reasons for and the far-reaching implications of the insensitivity of the Presence subscale for high levels of presence of meaning on, for example, the correlation between meaning in life and indicators of health are contemplated. Further investigation of the construct's nature and measurement, especially at high levels, is indicated.

Indexed as

Health Status IndicatorsAdultAustraliaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandPsychometricsQuality of LifeSouth AfricaSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID26790952
PMCPMC4719730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.