Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26790865›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2016

Application of Elastography for the Noninvasive Assessment of Biomechanics in Engineered Biomaterials and Tissues.

Woong Kim, Virginia L Ferguson, Mark Borden, Corey P Neu

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Computational models of melanoma.Theoretical biology & medical modelling · 2020
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Woong KimWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA.
Virginia L FergusonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80304, USA.
Mark BordenDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, 80304, USA.
Corey P NeuWeldon School of Biomedical Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA. cpneu@colorado.edu.
University of Colorado Boulder · USPurdue University West Lafayette · US

Funding

Probing Osteoarthritis Pathogenesis by Noninvasive Imaging of Cartilage StrainR01AR063712 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI NEU, COREY P · 2013 to 2023
$4.7M
Intervertebral Disc Mechanics Measured by dualMRI In VivoR21AR066665 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI NEU, COREY P · 2016 to 2017
$358k
Biomechanics of Human Articular Cartilage Measured In VivoR21AR066230 · NIAMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY · PI NEU, COREY P · 2014 to 2015
$357k
NIAMS NIH HHS L30 AR063435NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR063712NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR066230NIAMS NIH HHS R21 AR066665
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The elastic properties of engineered biomaterials and tissues impact their post-implantation repair potential and structural integrity, and are critical to help regulate cell fate and gene expression. The measurement of properties (e.g., stiffness or shear modulus) can be attained using elastography, which exploits noninvasive imaging modalities to provide functional information of a material indicative of the regeneration state. In this review, we outline the current leading elastography methodologies available to characterize the properties of biomaterials and tissues suitable for repair and mechanobiology research. We describe methods utilizing magnetic resonance, ultrasound, and optical coherent elastography, highlighting their potential for longitudinal monitoring of implanted materials in vivo, in addition to spatiotemporal limits of each method for probing changes in cell-laden constructs. Micro-elastography methods now allow acquisitions at length scales approaching 5-100 μm in two and three dimensions. Many of the methods introduced in this review are therefore capable of longitudinal monitoring in biomaterials and tissues approaching the cellular scale. However, critical factors such as anisotropy, heterogeneity and viscoelasity-inherent in many soft tissues-are often not fully described and therefore require further advancements and future developments.

Indexed as

Biocompatible MaterialsTissue EngineeringAnimalsElasticity Imaging TechniquesHumansBiocompatible MaterialsElasticityMagnetic resonance imaging (MRI)Optical coherence microscopyTissue engineering and regenerative medicineUltrasoundYoung’s modulus

Identifiers

PMID26790865
PMCPMC4792774
OpenAlexW2294568601

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.