Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26790863›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2016

Bacterial Diversity and Community Structure in Two Bornean Nepenthes Species with Differences in Nitrogen Acquisition Strategies.

Wiebke Sickel, T Ulmar Grafe, Ivonne Meuche, Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter, Alexander Keller

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. CarnivorousApplied and environmental microbiology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Wiebke SickelDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.
T Ulmar GrafeFaculty of Science, University Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link, Gadong, BE, 1410, Brunei.
Ivonne MeucheFaculty of Science, University Brunei Darussalam, Tungku Link, Gadong, BE, 1410, Brunei.
Ingolf Steffan-DewenterDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, 97074, Würzburg, Germany.
Alexander KellerDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, 97074, Würzburg, Germany. a.keller@biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Carnivorous plants of the genus Nepenthes have been studied for over a century, but surprisingly little is known about associations with microorganisms. The two species Nepenthes rafflesiana and Nepenthes hemsleyana differ in their pitcher-mediated nutrient sources, sequestering nitrogen from arthropod prey and arthropods as well as bat faeces, respectively. We expected bacterial communities living in the pitchers to resemble this diet difference. Samples were taken from different parts of the pitchers (leaf, peristome, inside, outside, digestive fluid) of both species. Bacterial communities were determined using culture-independent high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Bacterial richness and community structure were similar in leaves, peristomes, inside and outside walls of both plant species. Regarding digestive fluids, bacterial richness was higher in N. hemsleyana than in N. rafflesiana. Additionally, digestive fluid communities were highly variable in structure, with strain-specific differences in community composition between replicates. Acidophilic taxa were mostly of low abundance, except the genus Acidocella, which strikingly reached extremely high levels in two N. rafflesiana fluids. In N. hemsleyana fluid, some taxa classified as vertebrate gut symbionts as well as saprophytes were enriched compared to N. rafflesiana, with saprophytes constituting potential competitors for nutrients. The high variation in community structure might be caused by a number of biotic and abiotic factors. Nitrogen-fixing bacteria were present in both study species, which might provide essential nutrients to the plant at times of low prey capture and/or rare encounters with bats.

Indexed as

AcetobacteraceaeAnimalsArthropodsBacteriaBacterial Physiological PhenomenaBiodiversityBruneiMagnoliopsidaNitrogenNitrogen-Fixing BacteriaPlant LeavesRhizobiaceaeSymbiosisNitrogen16s rDNACarnivorous plantsNepenthesNext-generation sequencingPlant-microbe interactions

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.