Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26790862›Full record

ArticleHEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues2016

Models of Ethics Consultation Used by Canadian Ethics Consultants: A Qualitative Study.

Chris Kaposy, Fern Brunger, Victor Maddalena, Richard Singleton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in HEC forum : an interdisciplinary journal on hospitals' ethical and legal issues, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. The therapeutic potential of ethical dilemma resolution: A hypothesis.Australasian psychiatry : bulletin of Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists · 2024
    Article
  2. Ethical case interventions for adult patients.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chris KaposyDivision of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada. christopher.kaposy@med.mun.ca.
Fern BrungerDivision of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Victor MaddalenaDivision of Community Health and Humanities, Faculty of Medicine, Memorial University, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Richard SingletonFaculty of Theology, Queen's College, St. John's, NL, Canada.
Memorial University of Newfoundland · CAQueen's University · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article describes a qualitative study of models of ethics consultation used by ethics consultants in Canada. We found four different models used by Canadian ethics consultants whom we interviewed, and one sub-variant. We describe (1) the lone ethics consultant model, (1a) the hub-and-spokes sub-variant of this model; (2) the ethics committee model; (3) the capacity-building model; and (4) the facilitated model. Previous empirical studies of ethics consultation describe only two or three of these models.

Indexed as

Decision Support TechniquesEthics CommitteesCanadaEthics ConsultationHumansQualitative ResearchBioethicsClinical ethicsEthics consultationHealth care ethicsOrganizational ethics

Identifiers

PMID26790862
OpenAlexW2276045718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.