Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26790771›Full record

ReviewMutation research2016

Risky business: Microhomology-mediated end joining.

Supriya Sinha, Diana Villarreal, Eun Yong Shim, Sang Eun Lee

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mutation research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Structural and Mechanistic Diversity of Constitutional Chromoanagenesis.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The remodeling of Z-DNA in the mammalian germ line.Biochemical Society transactions · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Rtt105 promotes high-fidelity DNA replication and repair by regulating the single-stranded DNA-binding factor RPA.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Supriya SinhaDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Biotechnology, United States.
Diana VillarrealChildren's Hospital of San Antonio, Baylor College of Medicine, San Antonio, TX 78207, United States.
Eun Yong ShimDepartment of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX 78229, United States.
Sang Eun LeeDepartment of Molecular Medicine, Institute of Biotechnology, United States; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX 78229, United States. Electronic address: lees4@uthscsa.edu.

Funding

Institute for Integration of Medicine & Science: A Partnership to Improve HealthUL1TR001120 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI CLARK, ROBERT A, HARGREAVES, KENNETH M · 2013 to 2017
$16.5M
Mechanisms of Error Prone Repair of DNA BreaksR01GM071011 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS HLTH SCIENCE CENTER · PI LEE, SANG EUN · 2004 to 2021
$4.5M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001120NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM071011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prevalence of microhomology (MH) at the breakpoint junctions in somatic and germ-line chromosomal rearrangements and in the programmed immune receptor rearrangements from cells deficient in classical end joining reveals an enigmatic process called MH-mediated end joining (MMEJ). MMEJ repairs DNA double strand breaks (DSBs) by annealing flanking MH and deleting genetic information at the repair junctions from yeast to humans. Being genetically distinct from canonical DNA DSB pathways, MMEJ is involved with the fusions of eroded/uncapped telomeres as well as with the assembly of chromosome fragments in chromothripsis. In this review article, we will discuss an up-to-date model representing the MMEJ process and the mechanism by which cells regulate MMEJ to limit repair-associated mutagenesis. We will also describe the possible therapeutic gains resulting from the inhibition of MMEJ in recombination deficient cancers. Lastly, we will embark on two contentious issues associated with MMEJ such as the significance of MH at the repair junction to be the hallmark of MMEJ and the relationship of MMEJ to other mechanistically related DSB repair pathways.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedDNA End-Joining RepairModels, GeneticAnimalsCell CycleCell SurvivalHomologous RecombinationHumansINDEL MutationChromosomal rearrangementsDNA double strand break repairMicrohomology

Identifiers

PMID26790771
PMCPMC4887395

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.