ArticleNanoscale2016
Magnetically actuated tissue engineered scaffold: insights into mechanism of physical stimulation.
Article in Nanoscale, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed.
- Three-dimensional cellular construct with impregnated silicon nanowires for intracellular optoelectronic biointerface.Materials today. Bio · 2025Article
- Review
- Biomaterials functionalized with magnetic nanoparticles for tissue engineering: Between advantages and challenges.Biomaterials and biosystems · 2024Article
- Remote actuation and on-demand activation of biomaterials pre-incorporated with physical cues for bone repair.Theranostics · 2024Review
- Highly oriented hydrogels for tissue regeneration: design strategies, cellular mechanisms, and biomedical applications.Theranostics · 2024Review
- [Research advances on improving the therapeutic efficacy of mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes in wound repair].Zhonghua shao shang yu chuang mian xiu fu za zhi · 2023Article
- Extracellular vesicle-based biovectors in chronic wound healing: Biogenesis and delivery approaches.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2023Review
- Micro/Nanosystems for Magnetic Targeted Delivery of Bioagents.Pharmaceutics · 2022Review
- Magnetic Nanofibrous Scaffolds Accelerate the Regeneration of Muscle Tissue in Combination with Extra Magnetic Fields.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Core-Shell Magnetoactive PHB/Gelatin/Magnetite Composite Electrospun Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications.Polymers · 2022Article
- Development and Utilization of Multifunctional Polymeric Scaffolds for the Regulation of Physical Cellular Microenvironments.Polymers · 2021Review
- A review of biomimetic scaffolds for bone regeneration: Toward a cell-free strategy.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2021Review
- Review
- Active biomaterials for mechanobiology.Biomaterials · 2021Review
- Paramagnetic Functionalization of Biocompatible Scaffolds for Biomedical Applications: A Perspective.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Review
- In Vitro Innovation of Tendon Tissue Engineering Strategies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Fields on Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Using 3D Magnetic Scaffolds.Bioelectromagnetics · 2020Article
- Magnetic biomaterials and nano-instructive tools as mediators of tendon mechanotransduction.Nanoscale advances · 2020Review
- Nanoparticles as Versatile Tools for Mechanotransduction in Tissues and Organoids.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2020Review
- Exosomes Derived from Bone Mesenchymal Stem Cells with the Stimulation of FeInternational journal of nanomedicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Providing the right stimulatory conditions resulting in efficient tissue promoting microenvironment in vitro and in vivo is one of the ultimate goals in tissue development for regenerative medicine. It has been shown that in addition to molecular signals (e.g. growth factors) physical cues are also required for generation of functional cell constructs. These cues are particularly relevant to engineering of biological tissues, within which mechanical stress activates mechano-sensitive receptors, initiating biochemical pathways which lead to the production of functionally mature tissue. Uniform magnetic fields coupled with magnetizable nanoparticles embedded within three dimensional (3D) scaffold structures remotely create transient physical forces that can be transferrable to cells present in close proximity to the nanoparticles. This study investigated the hypothesis that magnetically responsive alginate scaffold can undergo reversible shape deformation due to alignment of scaffold's walls in a uniform magnetic field. Using custom made Helmholtz coil setup adapted to an Atomic Force Microscope we monitored changes in matrix dimensions in situ as a function of applied magnetic field, concentration of magnetic particles within the scaffold wall structure and rigidity of the matrix. Our results show that magnetically responsive scaffolds exposed to an externally applied time-varying uniform magnetic field undergo a reversible shape deformation. This indicates on possibility of generating bending/stretching forces that may exert a mechanical effect on cells due to alternating pattern of scaffold wall alignment and relaxation. We suggest that the matrix structure deformation is produced by immobilized magnetic nanoparticles within the matrix walls resulting in a collective alignment of scaffold walls upon magnetization. The estimated mechanical force that can be imparted on cells grown on the scaffold wall at experimental conditions is in the order of 1 pN, which correlates well with reported threshold to induce mechanotransduction effects on cellular level. This work is our next step in understanding of how to accurately create proper stimulatory microenvironment for promotion of cellular organization to form mature tissue engineered constructs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.