Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26790454›Full record

SynthesisAge and ageing2016

Older care-home residents as collaborators or advisors in research: a systematic review.

Tamara Backhouse, Andrea Kenkmann, Kathleen Lane, Bridget Penhale, Fiona Poland, Anne Killett

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Age and ageing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Public Involvement to Enhance Care Home Research; Collaboration on a Minimum Data Set for Care Homes.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2025
    Article
  12. Participatory research approaches in long-term care facilities for older adults: a meta-ethnography.International journal of qualitative studies on health and well-being · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tamara BackhouseSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Andrea KenkmannSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Kathleen LaneSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Bridget PenhaleSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Fiona PolandSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.
Anne KillettSchool of Health Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundpatient and public involvement (PPI) in research can enhance its relevance. Older care-home residents are often not involved in research processes even when studies are care-home focused.

objectiveto conduct a systematic review to find out to what extent and how older care-home residents have been involved in research as collaborators or advisors.

methodsa systematic literature search of 12 databases, covering the period from 1990 to September 2014 was conducted. A lateral search was also carried out. Standardised inclusion criteria were used and checked independently by two researchers.

resultsnineteen reports and papers were identified relating to 11 different studies. Care-home residents had been involved in the research process in multiple ways. Two key themes were identified: (i) the differences in residents' involvement in small-scale and large-scale studies and (ii) the barriers to and facilitators of involvement.

conclusionssmall-scale studies involved residents as collaborators in participatory action research, whereas larger studies involved residents as consultants in advisory roles. There are multiple facilitators of and barriers to involving residents as PPI members. The reporting of PPI varies. While it is difficult to evaluate the impact of involving care-home residents on the research outcomes, impact has been demonstrated from more inclusive research processes with care-home residents. The review shows that older care-home residents can be successfully involved in the research process.

Indexed as

Quality of LifeAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHealth Services ResearchHomes for the AgedHumansInternationalityMaleNursing HomesOrganizational InnovationOutcome Assessment, Health CarePatient ParticipationQuality Improvementcare homeolder peopleolder residentpatient and public involvementPPIresearchsystematic review

Identifiers

PMID26790454
PMCPMC4846791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.