Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26790446›Full record

ArticleTumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine2016

Contribution of in vitro comparison of colorectal carcinoma cells from primary and metastatic lesions to elucidation of mechanisms of tumor progression and response to anticancer therapy.

Lukáš Krbal, Veronika Hanušová, Jiří Soukup, Stanislav John, Petra Matoušková, Aleš Ryška

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Tumour biology : the journal of the International Society for Oncodevelopmental Biology and Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lukáš KrbalThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Sokolská 581, Hradec Kralove, CZ-500 05, Czech Republic.
Veronika HanušováDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Šimkova 870, Hradec Králové, CZ-500 38, Czech Republic. hanusovav@lfhk.cuni.cz.
Jiří SoukupThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Sokolská 581, Hradec Kralove, CZ-500 05, Czech Republic.
Stanislav JohnDepartment of Medical Biology and Genetics, Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Šimkova 870, Hradec Králové, CZ-500 38, Czech Republic.
Petra MatouškováDepartment of Biochemical Sciences, Faculty of Pharmacy in Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Heyrovského 1203, Hradec Králové, CZ-500 05, Czech Republic.
Aleš RyškaThe Fingerland Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and Faculty Hospital in Hradec Králové, Charles University in Prague, Sokolská 581, Hradec Kralove, CZ-500 05, Czech Republic.
Charles University · CZUniversity Hospital Hradec Králové · CZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer has been a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. For the research and individualization of therapy, primary cell lines of the colorectal cancer appear to be still an invaluable tool. We evaluated the differences in metastatic potential between four isolated primary colon cancer cells and cells derived from their lymph node metastasis. These results were compared with correspond immortalized cells-SW480 and SW620, respectively. The ability to migrate was tested using real-time measurement in xCELLigence system. Expressions of molecules involved in adhesion and invasion processes were examined using RT-PCR and western blot analysis. Furthermore, impact of cytotoxic effect of selected chemotherapeutics (irinotecan, oxaliplatin) and biological therapy (bevacizumab, cetuximab, panitumumab) was assessed by the WST assay. As expected, cell lines derived from lymph node migrated more aggressively and higher expression of adhesion molecules ICAM-1, EpCAM, and N-cadherin was detected. The expression of MMP-2 and -9 was elevated, on the other hand, in cell lines derived from primary tumor cancer cells as well as the expression of miR-21, miR-29a, and miR-200a. The most pronounced cytotoxic effect has been recorded with oxaliplatin and irinotecan (IC50 = 48.23 resp. 0.11 μg/ml), especially in cells originating from lymph node metastases. In total, comparison of isolated cell lines and immortalized cell lines has shown many similarities, as well as several differences. Adhesion/invasion molecules and several miRNAs, which play an important role in tumor development and the invasive and migratory behavior, could be a useful therapeutic target in malignant colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell AdhesionCell Adhesion MoleculesCell Line, TumorCell MovementColorectal NeoplasmsDisease ProgressionHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph NodesMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9MicroRNAsAntineoplastic AgentsCell Adhesion MoleculesMatrix Metalloproteinase 2Matrix Metalloproteinase 9MicroRNAsAnticancer therapyColorectal carcinomaLymph node metastasismicroRNATumor progression

Identifiers

PMID26790446
OpenAlexW2302294892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.