SynthesisSports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.)2016
Submaximal, Perceptually Regulated Exercise Testing Predicts Maximal Oxygen Uptake: A Meta-Analysis Study.
Synthesis in Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Smartwatch-Derived VO2max Prediction Model for Korean Adults: Utilizing Heart Rate and GPS Data from the 12-Minute Cooper Test.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Perceived Exertion: Revisiting the History and Updating the Neurophysiology and the Practical Applications.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Review
- The Use of Ratings of Perceived Exertion in Children and Adolescents: A Scoping Review.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2021Article
- Comparison of Methods for the Estimation of the Maximum Oxygen Uptake of Men Drug Addicts.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- An Experimental Study of Step Test Index Combined With Heart Rate Variability in Estimating Maximum Oxygen Uptake in Women With Drug Use Disorder.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Effects of Terbutaline Sulfate on Physiological and Biomechanical as Well as Perceived Exertion in Healthy Active Athletes: A Pilot Study.Journal of human kinetics · 2019Article
- Validity of maximal oxygen consumption prediction equations in young Saudi females.Saudi medical journal · 2019Article
- Cardio-pulmonary responses to incremental eccentric and concentric cycling tests to task failure.European journal of applied physiology · 2018Article
- Relationships between rating of perceived exertion, heart rate and blood lactate during continuous and alternated-intensity cycling exercises.Biology of sport · 2018Article
- Exergaming: Feels good despite working harder.PloS one · 2017Article
- Article
- Validity of a perceptually-regulated step test protocol for assessing cardiorespiratory fitness in healthy adults.European journal of applied physiology · 2016Article
- Author's Reply to Will G. Hopkins: "Submaximal, Perceptually Regulated Exercise Testing Predicts Maximal Oxygen Uptake: A Meta-Analysis Study".Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2016Article
- Comment on: "Submaximal, Perceptually Regulated Exercise Testing Predicts Maximal Oxygen Uptake: A Meta-Analysis Study".Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRecently, several authors have proposed the use of a submaximal 'perceptually regulated exercise test' (PRET) to predict maximal oxygen uptake ([Formula: see text]). The PRET involves asking the individual to self-regulate a series of short bouts of exercise corresponding to pre-set ratings of perceived exertion (RPE). The individual linear relationship between RPE and oxygen uptake (RPE:[Formula: see text]) is then extrapolated to the [Formula: see text], which corresponds to the theoretical maximal RPE (RPE20). Studies suggest that prediction accuracy from this method may be better improved during a second PRET. Similarly, some authors have recommended an extrapolation to RPE19 rather than RPE20.
objectivesThe purpose of the meta-analysis was to examine the validity of the method of predicting [Formula: see text] from the RPE:[Formula: see text] during a PRET, and to determine the level of agreement and accuracy of predicting [Formula: see text] from an initial PRET and retest using RPE19 and RPE20. DATA SOURCES: From a systematic search of the literature, 512 research articles were identified. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: The eligible manuscripts were those which used the relationship between the RPE≤15 and [Formula: see text], and used only the Borg's RPE scale. PARTICIPANTS AND
interventionsTen studies (n = 274 individuals) were included. STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS
methodsFor each study, actual and predicted [Formula: see text] from four subgroup outcomes (RPE19 in the initial test, RPE19 in the retest, RPE20 in the initial test, RPE20 in the retest) were identified, and then compared. The magnitude of the difference regardless of subgroup outcomes was examined to determine if it is better to predict [Formula: see text] from extrapolation to RPE19 or RPE20. The magnitude of differences was examined for the best PRET (test vs retest).
resultsThe results revealed that [Formula: see text] may be predicted from RPE:[Formula: see text] during PRET in different populations and in various PRET modalities, regardless of the subgroup outcomes. To obtain greater accuracy of predictions, extrapolation to RPE20 during a retest may be recommended. LIMITATIONS: The included studies reported poor selection bias and data collection methods. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS OF KEY
findingsThe [Formula: see text] may be predicted from RPE:[Formula: see text] during PRET, especially when [Formula: see text] is extrapolated to RPE20 during a second PRET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.