Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26790362›Full record

ReviewHuman gene therapy2016

Gene Therapy for X-Linked Severe Combined Immunodeficiency: Where Do We Stand?

Marina Cavazzana, Emmanuelle Six, Chantal Lagresle-Peyrou, Isabelle André-Schmutz, Salima Hacein-Bey-Abina

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human gene therapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03538899 (Phase I/II Safety and Efficacy Study of Gene Transfer for Artemis-Deficient Severe Combined Immunodeficiency), which is not on this map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03538899 phase1 / phase2recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Phase I/II Safety and Efficacy Study of Gene Transfer for Artemis-Deficient Severe Combined Immunodeficiency (ART-SCID) in Newly Diagnosed Patients Using Self-Inactivating Lentiviral Vector (AProArt) to Transduce Autologous CD34 Hematopoietic Cells

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of California, San FranciscoRan2018 to 2038Enrolled24ConditionsSevere Combined ImmunodeficiencyArmsAProArt-CD34, CliniMACS® CD34 Reagent System cell sorter device, Busulfan
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 108 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Ex vivo modification of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells for gene therapy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Lentiviral Production Platform.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Salivary Gland Bioengineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Evaluation and Designing of Epitopic-Peptide Vaccine AgainstInternational journal of peptide research and therapeutics · 2022
    Article
  18. Development and clinical translation ofComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. HIV-based lentiviral vectors: origin and sequence differences.Molecular therapy. Methods & clinical development · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Marina Cavazzana1 Biotherapy Department, Necker Children's Hospital , Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris.
Emmanuelle Six2 Biotherapy Clinical Investigation Center, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Ouest , Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, Paris.
Chantal Lagresle-Peyrou2 Biotherapy Clinical Investigation Center, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Ouest , Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, Paris.
Isabelle André-Schmutz2 Biotherapy Clinical Investigation Center, Groupe Hospitalier Universitaire Ouest , Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, INSERM, Paris.
Salima Hacein-Bey-Abina1 Biotherapy Department, Necker Children's Hospital , Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris.
Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRSorbonne Paris Cité · FR

Funding

European Research Council 269037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

More than 20 years ago, X-linked severe combined immunodeficiency (SCID-X1) appeared to be the best condition to test the feasibility of hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy. The seminal SCID-X1 clinical studies, based on first-generation gammaretroviral vectors, demonstrated good long-term immune reconstitution in most treated patients despite the occurrence of vector-related leukemia in a few of them. This gene therapy has successfully enabled correction of the T cell defect. Natural killer and B cell defects were only partially restored, most likely due to the absence of a conditioning regimen. The success of these pioneering trials paved the way for the extension of gene-based treatment to many other diseases of the hematopoietic system, but the unfortunate serious adverse events led to extensive investigations to define the retrovirus integration profiles. This review puts into perspective the clinical experience of gene therapy for SCID-X1, with the development and implementation of new generations of safer vectors such as self-inactivating gammaretroviral or lentiviral vectors as well as major advances in integrome knowledge.

Indexed as

B-LymphocytesClinical Trials as TopicGammaretrovirusGenetic TherapyGenetic VectorsHematopoietic Stem CellsHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationHumansKiller Cells, NaturalLentivirusPatient SafetyRetroviridaeT-LymphocytesVirus IntegrationX-Linked Combined Immunodeficiency Diseases

Identifiers

PMID26790362
PMCPMC4779287
OpenAlexW2291715119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.