Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26790349›Full record

ReviewBrain research2016

Norepinephrine versus dopamine and their interaction in modulating synaptic function in the prefrontal cortex.

Bo Xing, Yan-Chun Li, Wen-Jun Gao

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Concomitant activation of DResearch square · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Concomitant activation of DDiscover pharmaceutical sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bo XingDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia PA 19129, United States.
Yan-Chun LiDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia PA 19129, United States.
Wen-Jun GaoDepartment of Neurobiology and Anatomy, Drexel University College of Medicine, 2900 Queen Lane, Philadelphia PA 19129, United States. Electronic address: wgao@drexelmed.edu.
Drexel University · US

Funding

Development of NMDAR hypofunction and cognitive deficitsR01MH085666 · NIMH · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI GAO, WEN-JUN · 2009 to 2018
$3.8M
AKT deficiency alters dopamine sensitivity in the prefrontal cortexR03MH101578 · NIMH · DREXEL UNIVERSITY · PI LI, YAN-CHUN · 2014 to 2015
$156k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH085666NIMH NIH HHS R03 MH101578
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Among the neuromodulators that regulate prefrontal cortical circuit function, the catecholamine transmitters norepinephrine (NE) and dopamine (DA) stand out as powerful players in working memory and attention. Perturbation of either NE or DA signaling is implicated in the pathogenesis of several neuropsychiatric disorders, including attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), schizophrenia, and drug addiction. Although the precise mechanisms employed by NE and DA to cooperatively control prefrontal functions are not fully understood, emerging research indicates that both transmitters regulate electrical and biochemical aspects of neuronal function by modulating convergent ionic and synaptic signaling in the prefrontal cortex (PFC). This review summarizes previous studies that investigated the effects of both NE and DA on excitatory and inhibitory transmissions in the prefrontal cortical circuitry. Specifically, we focus on the functional interaction between NE and DA in prefrontal cortical local circuitry, synaptic integration, signaling pathways, and receptor properties. Although it is clear that both NE and DA innervate the PFC extensively and modulate synaptic function by activating distinctly different receptor subtypes and signaling pathways, it remains unclear how these two systems coordinate their actions to optimize PFC function for appropriate behavior. Throughout this review, we provide perspectives and highlight several critical topics for future studies. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled SI: Noradrenergic System.

Indexed as

AnimalsDopamineHumansNorepinephrinePrefrontal CortexSynapsesSynaptic TransmissionDopamineNorepinephrineDopamineNeuromodulatorNorepinephrinePrefrontal cortexPsychiatric disorders

Identifiers

PMID26790349
PMCPMC4879059
OpenAlexW2234486753

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.