Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26789995›Full record

ArticleJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2015

Is individual social deprivation associated with adverse perinatal outcomes? Results of a French multicentre cross-sectional survey.

A Lelong, L Jiroff, M Blanquet, C Mourgues, M C Leymarie, L Gerbaud, D Lémery, F Vendittelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A meta-analysis of the role of neighborhood deprivation in psychotic disorders.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Deprived areas and adverse perinatal outcome: a systematic review.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Perceptions and behaviour of pregnant women in socioeconomic deprivation in rural areas. A qualitative study in France.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

A LelongService de Santé Publique, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France;
L JiroffService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand;
M BlanquetService de Santé Publique, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France;
C MourguesService de Santé Publique, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France;
M C LeymarieService de Santé Publique, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France;
L GerbaudService de Santé Publique, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France;
D LémeryService de Gynécologie Obstétrique, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand;
F VendittelliService de Santé Publique, CHU de Clermont-Ferrand, Clermont-Ferrand Cedex 1, France;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionFrench national health programmes take into account social deprivation in their implementation, those targeting perinatal outcomes, especially. The main aim of the present work was to assess the association between individual social deprivation and adverse perinatal outcomes.

methodsA multicentre cross-sectional population-based survey was performed between October and December 2007. Eligible women delivered a baby in one of the three maternity hospitals of Clermont-Ferrand area, and read and spoke French fluently. Women who had undergone voluntary termination of pregnancy were excluded. Individual social deprivation was measured by the EPICES score. Standard prenatal follow-up defined by having less than 7 consultations and quality of prenatal care defined by having at least four consultations were measured. Adverse perinatal outcomes were measured by a composite criterion defined by women who had the occurrence of the three main causes of pregnancy-related disorders: preterm delivery, and/or diabetes, and/or obstetrical hypertension.

resultsOf the 471 eligible women, 464 were finally included. One hundred and fifteen (24.78%) women were socially deprived. The most deprived women had poor standard prenatal follow-up (p = 0.003) and poor quality of prenatal care (0.03). Nationality was the sole confounding factor identified. Deprived women had a two-fold greater risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, adjusted odds ratio 1.95 [1.15; 3.29]. DISCUSSION: Social deprivation was associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. Social deprivation should be systematically screened in pregnant women standard follow-up, among migrant women, especially.

Indexed as

Adverse perinatal outcomesEPICES scoreIndividual Social deprivationPreterm birth

Identifiers

PMID26789995
PMCPMC4718350

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.