Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26789839›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2016

Factors Motivating Individuals to Consider Genetic Testing for Type 2 Diabetes Risk Prediction.

Jennifer Wessel, Jyoti Gupta, Mary de Groot

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Perspectives on Consumer and Clinical Genetic Testing Education among Medical Students in West Texas.Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jennifer WesselDepartment of Epidemiology, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Jyoti GuptaDepartment of Epidemiology, Indiana University Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Mary de GrootDepartment of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States of America.
Indiana University School of MedicineIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · US

Funding

Indiana Clinical and Translational Sciences InstituteUL1TR001108 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DENNE, SCOTT C., SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2013 to 2017
$23.3M
Indiana Clinical and Translational Science Institute (UL1)UL1TR000006 · NCATS · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI SHEKHAR, ANANTHA · 2012 to 2013
$5.6M
Program ACTIVE II: Behavioral Depression Treatment for Type 2 DiabetesR18DK092765 · NIDDK · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI DE GROOT, MARY K. · 2011 to 2015
$3.2M
NCATS NIH HHS TR000006NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000006NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001108NIDDK NIH HHS R18 DK092765NIDDK NIH HHS R18DK092765
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify attitudes and perceptions of willingness to participate in genetic testing for type 2 diabetes (T2D) risk prediction in the general population. Adults (n = 598) were surveyed on attitudes about utilizing genetic testing to predict future risk of T2D. Participants were recruited from public libraries (53%), online registry (37%) and a safety net hospital emergency department (10%). Respondents were 37 ± 11 years old, primarily White (54%), female (69%), college educated (46%), with an annual income ≥$25,000 (56%). Half of participants were interested in genetic testing for T2D (52%) and 81% agreed/strongly agreed genetic testing should be available to the public. Only 57% of individuals knew T2D is preventable. A multivariate model to predict interest in genetic testing was adjusted for age, gender, recruitment location and BMI; significant predictors were motivation (high perceived personal risk of T2D [OR = 4.38 (1.76, 10.9)]; family history [OR = 2.56 (1.46, 4.48)]; desire to know risk prior to disease onset [OR = 3.25 (1.94, 5.42)]; and knowing T2D is preventable [OR = 2.11 (1.24, 3.60)], intention (if the cost is free [OR = 10.2 (4.27, 24.6)]; and learning T2D is preventable [OR = 5.18 (1.95, 13.7)]) and trust of genetic testing results [OR = 0.03 (0.003, 0.30)]. Individuals are interested in genetic testing for T2D risk which offers unique information that is personalized. Financial accessibility, validity of the test and availability of diabetes prevention programs were identified as predictors of interest in T2D testing.

Indexed as

Genetic TestingMotivationRegistriesAdolescentAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2FemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk

Identifiers

PMID26789839
PMCPMC4720283
OpenAlexW2414780290

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.