Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26789831›Full record

ReviewJournal of preventive medicine and hygiene2015

Influenza vaccination in the elderly: why are the overall benefits still hotly debated?

C Trucchi, C Paganino, A Orsi, D De Florentiis, F Ansaldi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of preventive medicine and hygiene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Severe aspiration pneumonia in the elderly.Journal of intensive medicine · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Observational
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

C TrucchiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy and IRCCS University Hospital San Martino, IST National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy.
C PaganinoDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy and IRCCS University Hospital San Martino, IST National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy.
A OrsiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy and IRCCS University Hospital San Martino, IST National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy.
D De FlorentiisDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy and IRCCS University Hospital San Martino, IST National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy.
F AnsaldiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Genoa, Italy and IRCCS University Hospital San Martino, IST National Institute for Cancer Research, Genoa, Italy.
Martin University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The exact magnitude of the benefit of influenza vaccine among elderly individuals is subject of considerable debated. Existing vaccine effectiveness estimates come mostly from observational studies, which may be biased because of difficulties in identifying and adjusting for confounders. In this paper, we examine the potential sources of bias in observational studies of influenza vaccine effectiveness in the elderly and we discuss available evidence regarding the efficacy and effectiveness of licensed influenza vaccines. Although several methodological criticisms among the available analyses on seasonal vaccines for elderly were identified, overall seasonal influenza vaccines showed relevant efficacy/effectiveness in reducing the risk of influenza and its complications in the elderly, considering different measure of outcome.

Indexed as

Influenza vaccineVaccine effectivenessVaccine efficacy

Identifiers

PMID26789831
PMCPMC4718343
OpenAlexW1598610466

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.