Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26789772›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

Electroporation of Brain Endothelial Cells on Chip toward Permeabilizing the Blood-Brain Barrier.

Mohammad Bonakdar, Elisa M Wasson, Yong W Lee, Rafael V Davalos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. A Multiplexed Microfluidic Device to Measure Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption by Pulsed Electric Fields.Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual International Conference · 2021
    Article
  10. Electrotherapies for Glioblastoma.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  11. An atlas of nano-enabled neural interfaces.Nature nanotechnology · 2019
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mohammad BonakdarDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia. Electronic address: mohammad@vt.edu.
Elisa M WassonDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Yong W LeeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia; School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Virginia Tech - Wake Forest University, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Rafael V DavalosDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia; Department of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia; School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences, Virginia Tech - Wake Forest University, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.

Funding

Isolation of Tumor Initiating Cells (TICs) using Contactless DielectrophoresisR21CA173092 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI CRAMER, SCOTT D, DAVALOS, RAFAEL VIDAL · 2012 to 2013
$368k
NCI NIH HHS 5R21 CA173092-01NCI NIH HHS R21 CA173092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The blood-brain barrier, mainly composed of brain microvascular endothelial cells, poses an obstacle to drug delivery to the brain. Controlled permeabilization of the constituent brain endothelial cells can result in overcoming this barrier and increasing transcellular transport across it. Electroporation is a biophysical phenomenon that has shown potential in permeabilizing and overcoming this barrier. In this study we developed a microengineered in vitro model to characterize the permeabilization of adhered brain endothelial cells to large molecules in response to applied pulsed electric fields. We found the distribution of affected cells by reversible and irreversible electroporation, and quantified the uptaken amount of naturally impermeable molecules into the cells as a result of applied pulse magnitude and number of pulses. We achieved 81 ± 1.7% (N = 6) electroporated cells with 17 ± 8% (N = 5) cell death using an electric-field magnitude of ∼580 V/cm and 10 pulses. Our results provide the proper range for applied electric-field intensity and number of pulses for safe permeabilization without significantly compromising cell viability. Our results demonstrate that it is possible to permeabilize the endothelial cells of the BBB in a controlled manner, therefore lending to the feasibility of using pulsed electric fields to increase drug transport across the BBB through the transcellular pathway.

Indexed as

Capillary PermeabilityAnimalsBlood-Brain BarrierCell LineElectroporationEndothelial CellsMiceMicrofluidics

Identifiers

PMID26789772
PMCPMC4724630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.