Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26789755›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

The Role of Correlation and Solvation in Ion Interactions with B-DNA.

Maria L Sushko, Dennis G Thomas, Suzette A Pabit, Lois Pollack, Alexey V Onufriev, Nathan A Baker

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Kir7.1 disease mutant T153I within the inner pore affects KAmerican journal of physiology. Cell physiology · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Similarities and Differences between NaJournal of chemical theory and computation · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Competitive Binding of MgBiophysical journal · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Counting the ions surrounding nucleic acids.Nucleic acids research · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Maria L SushkoPhysical Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
Dennis G ThomasBiological Sciences Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington.
Suzette A PabitSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Lois PollackSchool of Applied and Engineering Physics, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Alexey V OnufrievDepartment of Computer Science and Department of Physics, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia.
Nathan A BakerComputational and Statistical Analytics Division, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington; Division of Applied Mathematics, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island. Electronic address: nathan.baker@pnnl.gov.
Cornell University · USPacific Northwest National Laboratory · USBrown University · USVirginia Tech · US

Funding

DNA - DNA interactions with atomic detailR01GM099450 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BAKER, NATHAN A., ONUFRIEV, ALEXEY VLAD · 2012 to 2015
$1.3M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099450NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM099450
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ionic atmospheres around nucleic acids play important roles in biological function. Large-scale explicit solvent simulations coupled to experimental assays such as anomalous small-angle x-ray scattering can provide important insights into the structure and energetics of such atmospheres but are time- and resource intensive. In this article, we use classical density functional theory to explore the balance among ion-DNA, ion-water, and ion-ion interactions in ionic atmospheres of RbCl, SrCl2, and CoHexCl3 (cobalt hexamine chloride) around a B-form DNA molecule. The accuracy of the classical density functional theory calculations was assessed by comparison between simulated and experimental anomalous small-angle x-ray scattering curves, demonstrating that an accurate model should take into account ion-ion correlation and ion hydration forces, DNA topology, and the discrete distribution of charges on the DNA backbone. As expected, these calculations revealed significant differences among monovalent, divalent, and trivalent cation distributions around DNA. Approximately half of the DNA-bound Rb(+) ions penetrate into the minor groove of the DNA and half adsorb on the DNA backbone. The fraction of cations in the minor groove decreases for the larger Sr(2+) ions and becomes zero for CoHex(3+) ions, which all adsorb on the DNA backbone. The distribution of CoHex(3+) ions is mainly determined by Coulomb and steric interactions, while ion-correlation forces play a central role in the monovalent Rb(+) distribution and a combination of ion-correlation and hydration forces affect the Sr(2+) distribution around DNA. This does not imply that correlations in CoHex solutions are weaker or stronger than for other ions. Steric inaccessibility of the grooves to large CoHex ions leads to their binding at the DNA surface. In this binding mode, first-order electrostatic interactions (Coulomb) dominate the overall binding energy as evidenced by low sensitivity of ionic distribution to the presence or absence of second-order electrostatic correlation interactions.

Indexed as

CobaltDNA, B-FormRubidiumStatic ElectricityStrontiumCobaltDNA, B-FormRubidiumStrontium

Identifiers

PMID26789755
PMCPMC4724655
OpenAlexW1562933580

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.