Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26789754›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

Unzipping of A-Form DNA-RNA, A-Form DNA-PNA, and B-Form DNA-DNA in the α-Hemolysin Nanopore.

Rukshan T Perera, Aaron M Fleming, Amberlyn M Peterson, Jennifer M Heemstra, Cynthia J Burrows, Henry S White

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rukshan T PereraDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Aaron M FlemingDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Amberlyn M PetersonDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Jennifer M HeemstraDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Cynthia J BurrowsDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Electronic address: burrows@chem.utah.edu.
Henry S WhiteDepartment of Chemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah. Electronic address: white@chem.utah.edu.

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI KATHARINE S ULLMAN · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
Nanopore Detection of DNA DamageR01GM093099 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI BURROWS, CYNTHIA J · 2011 to 2021
$3.0M
Identification and Quantification of Sequence Specific RNA Modifications via the Alpha-Hemolysin Latch ZoneR41DA038989 · NIDA · ELECTRONIC BIOSCIENCES, INC. · PI ERVIN, ERIC · 2014 to 2014
$216k
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NIDA NIH HHS R41 DA038989NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM093099
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unzipping of double-stranded nucleic acids by an electric field applied across a wild-type α-hemolysin (αHL) nanopore provides structural information about different duplex forms. In this work, comparative studies on A-form DNA-RNA duplexes and B-form DNA-DNA duplexes with a single-stranded tail identified significant differences in the blockage current and the unzipping duration between the two helical forms. We observed that the B-form duplex blocks the channel 1.9 ± 0.2 pA more and unzips ∼15-fold more slowly than an A-form duplex at 120 mV. We developed a model to describe the dependence of duplex unzipping on structure. We demonstrate that the wider A-form duplex (d = 2.4 nm) is unable to enter the vestibule opening of αHL on the cis side, leading to unzipping outside of the nanopore with higher residual current and faster unzipping times. In contrast, the smaller B-form duplexes (d = 2.0 nm) enter the vestibule of αHL, resulting in decreased current blockages and slower unzipping. We investigated the effects of varying the length of the single-stranded overhang, and studied A-form DNA-PNA duplexes to provide additional support for the proposed model. This study identifies key differences between A- and B-form duplex unzipping that will be important in the design of future probe-based methods for detecting DNA or RNA.

Indexed as

Base PairingNanoporesAmino Acid SequenceBacterial ToxinsBase SequenceDNA, A-FormDNA, B-FormDNA, Single-StrandedHemolysin ProteinsMolecular Sequence DataProtein BindingRNABacterial ToxinsDNA, A-FormDNA, B-FormDNA, Single-StrandedHemolysin ProteinsRNAstaphylococcal alpha-toxin

Identifiers

PMID26789754
PMCPMC4724626

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.