Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26788281›Full record

ArticleMolecular autism2016

Olfactory processing in adults with autism spectrum disorders.

Bruno Wicker, Elisabetta Monfardini, Jean-Pierre Royet

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular autism, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Exposure to GABAFrontiers in psychiatry · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The Olfactory System as Marker of Neurodegeneration in Aging, Neurological and Neuropsychiatric Disorders.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bruno WickerInstitut de Neurosciences de la Timone. CNRS & Université Aix-Marseille, Campus Santé Timone 27, Boulevard Jean Moulin, 13385 Marseille cedex 05, France.
Elisabetta MonfardiniIntegrative, Multisensory, Perception, Action and Cognition Team, Lyon, F-69000 France ; University Lyon 1, Lyon, F-69000 France ; Institut de Médecine Environnementale, Paris, France.
Jean-Pierre RoyetINSERM U1028, CNRS UMR5292, Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Olfaction : From Coding to Memory Team, Lyon, F-69000 France ; University Lyon 1, Lyon, F-69000 France.
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAs evidenced in the DSM-V, autism spectrum disorders (ASD) are often characterized by atypical sensory behavior (hyper- or hypo-reactivity), but very few studies have evaluated olfactory abilities in individuals with ASD.

methodsFifteen adults with ASD and 15 typically developing participants underwent olfactory tests focused on superficial (suprathreshold detection task), perceptual (intensity and pleasantness judgment tasks), and semantic (identification task) odor processing.

resultsIn terms of suprathreshold detection performance, decreased discrimination scores and increased bias scores were observed in the ASD group. Furthermore, the participants with ASD exhibited increased intensity judgment scores and impaired scores for pleasantness judgments of unpleasant odorants. Decreased identification performance was also observed in the participants with ASD compared with the typically developing participants. This decrease was partly attributed to a higher number of near misses (a category close to veridical labels) among the participants with ASD than was observed among the typically developing participants.

conclusionsThe changes in discrimination and bias scores were the result of a high number of false alarms among the participants with ASD, which suggests the adoption of a liberal attitude in their responses. Atypical intensity and pleasantness ratings were associated with hyperresponsiveness and flattened emotional reactions, respectively, which are typical of participants with ASD. The high number of near misses as non-veridical labels suggested that categorical processing is functional in individuals with ASD and could be explained by attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. These findings are discussed in terms of dysfunction of the olfactory system.

Indexed as

OdorantsOlfactory PerceptionAdultAutism Spectrum DisorderDifferential ThresholdEmotionsFemaleHumansHyperesthesiaHypesthesiaMaleOlfactory PathwaysPleasureRecognition, PsychologySensory ThresholdsYoung AdultAutism spectrum disordersHyperresponsivenessIdentificationIntensityOlfactionPleasantnessSuprathreshold detection

Identifiers

PMID26788281
PMCPMC4717566
OpenAlexW2262883984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.