ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016
Brain responses in humans reveal ideal observer-like sensitivity to complex acoustic patterns.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 124 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
124 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Characterizing hippocampal dynamics with MEG: A systematic review and evidence-based guidelines.Human brain mapping · 2019Pooled it
- Residual Language Abilities Correlate With Diagnosis and Prognosis in Patients With Disorders of Consciousness.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2026Article
- Neural and autonomic predictors of future listening errors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Neuromagnetic representation of vowel prosody in the auditory cortex.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Modality-general sensitivity of pupil responses to regularity violations.Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neural mechanisms of time-forward predictions for naturalistic auditory tone sequences.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Reply to: "No evidence of neural feature-specific pre-activation during the prediction of an upcoming stimulus".Nature communications · 2026Article
- Non-verbal dichotic listening: A new cognitive hearing test for dementia.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Not All Rules Are Equal: Rare Conditional Rules Shape Behaviour but Yield to Global Probability in Passive Listening.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- The Interplay of Bottom-Up Arousal and Attentional Capture during Auditory Scene Analysis: Evidence from Ocular Dynamics.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Discovery, Interruption, and Updating of Auditory Regularities in Memory: Evidence from Low-Frequency Brain Dynamics in Human MEG.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2026Article
- Temporal codes and recurrent timing nets for rhythmic expectancy.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- Neuronal mismatch responses to auditory stimuli in the dorsal hippocampus of anesthetized rats.Communications biology · 2025Article
- The Effect of Previously Encountered Sensory Information on Neural Representations of Predictability: Evidence From Human EEG.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- The detection of algebraic auditory structures emerges with self-supervised learning.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- EEG neural indicator of temporal integration in the human auditory brain with clinical implications.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Brain complexity represents uncertainty in sequence learning and corroborates habituation deficit in Parkinson disease patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- EEG Correlates of Auditory Short-Term Memory and Dissimilarity Perception in Young and Older Adults.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Article
- Predicted Sensory Modality Determines the Timing and Topographies of Omitted Stimulus Potentials.Psychophysiology · 2025Article
- Direct brain recordings reveal implicit encoding of structure in random auditory streams.Scientific reports · 2025Article
64 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We use behavioral methods, magnetoencephalography, and functional MRI to investigate how human listeners discover temporal patterns and statistical regularities in complex sound sequences. Sensitivity to patterns is fundamental to sensory processing, in particular in the auditory system, because most auditory signals only have meaning as successions over time. Previous evidence suggests that the brain is tuned to the statistics of sensory stimulation. However, the process through which this arises has been elusive. We demonstrate that listeners are remarkably sensitive to the emergence of complex patterns within rapidly evolving sound sequences, performing on par with an ideal observer model. Brain responses reveal online processes of evidence accumulation--dynamic changes in tonic activity precisely correlate with the expected precision or predictability of ongoing auditory input--both in terms of deterministic (first-order) structure and the entropy of random sequences. Source analysis demonstrates an interaction between primary auditory cortex, hippocampus, and inferior frontal gyrus in the process of discovering the regularity within the ongoing sound sequence. The results are consistent with precision based predictive coding accounts of perceptual inference and provide compelling neurophysiological evidence of the brain's capacity to encode high-order temporal structure in sensory signals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.