Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26787733›Full record

ReviewBlood2016

Genomic landscape of megakaryopoiesis and platelet function defects.

Elisa Bianchi, Ruggiero Norfo, Valentina Pennucci, Roberta Zini, Rossella Manfredini

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Blood, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. DMAG, a novel countermeasure for the treatment of thrombocytopenia.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2021
    Article
  19. Review
  20. GPIbα is the driving force of hepatic thrombopoietin generation.Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Elisa BianchiCentre for Regenerative Medicine Stefano Ferrari, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6110-5944
Ruggiero NorfoCentre for Regenerative Medicine Stefano Ferrari, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; and Haematopoietic Stem Cell Biology Laboratory, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Valentina PennucciCentre for Regenerative Medicine Stefano Ferrari, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; and.
Roberta ZiniCentre for Regenerative Medicine Stefano Ferrari, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6657-0864
Rossella ManfrediniCentre for Regenerative Medicine Stefano Ferrari, Department of Life Sciences, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; and.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0660-6110
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Megakaryopoiesis is a complex, stepwise process that takes place largely in the bone marrow. At the apex of the hierarchy, hematopoietic stem cells undergo a number of lineage commitment decisions that ultimately lead to the production of polyploid megakaryocytes. On average, megakaryocytes release 10(11) platelets per day into the blood that repair vascular injuries and prevent excessive bleeding. This differentiation process is tightly controlled by exogenous and endogenous factors, which have been the topics of intense research in the hematopoietic field. Indeed, a skewing of megakaryocyte commitment and differentiation may entail the onset of myeloproliferative neoplasms and other preleukemic disorders together with acute megakaryoblastic leukemia, whereas quantitative or qualitative defects in platelet production can lead to inherited platelet disorders. The recent advent of next-generation sequencing has prompted mapping of the genomic landscape of these conditions to provide an accurate view of the underlying lesions. The aims of this review are to introduce the physiological pathways of megakaryopoiesis and to present landmark studies on acquired and inherited disorders that target them. These studies have not only introduced a new era in the fields of molecular medicine and targeted therapies but may also provide us with a better understanding of the mechanisms underlying normal megakaryopoiesis and thrombopoiesis that can inform efforts to create alternative sources of megakaryocytes and platelets.

Indexed as

Blood Platelet DisordersBlood PlateletsGenetic Diseases, InbornGenome, HumanMegakaryocytesAnimalsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansThrombopoiesis

Identifiers

PMID26787733
PMCPMC4841296
OpenAlexW2346068973

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.