Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26787691›Full record

Trial reportAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy2016

Validation and Clinical Evaluation of a Novel Method To Measure Miltefosine in Leishmaniasis Patients Using Dried Blood Spot Sample Collection.

A E Kip, H Rosing, M J X Hillebrand, S Blesson, B Mengesha, E Diro, A Hailu, J H M Schellens, J H Beijnen, T P C Dorlo

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialValidation Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

A E KipDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands anke.kip@slz.nl t.p.c.dorlo@uu.nl.
H RosingDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
M J X HillebrandDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
S BlessonDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative, Geneva, Switzerland.
B MengeshaLeishmaniasis Research and Treatment Center, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
E DiroDepartment of Internal Medicine, University of Gondar, Gondar, Ethiopia.
A HailuDepartment of Microbiology, Immunology, and Parasitology, School of Medicine, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
J H M SchellensDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
J H BeijnenDepartment of Pharmacy & Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands Division of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital/Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
T P C DorloDivision of Pharmacoepidemiology & Clinical Pharmacology, Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Science, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands Pharmacometrics Research Group, Department of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden anke.kip@slz.nl t.p.c.dorlo@uu.nl.
The Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLUniversity of Gondar · ETAddis Ababa University · ETDrugs for Neglected Diseases Initiative · CHUppsala University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To facilitate future pharmacokinetic studies of combination treatments against leishmaniasis in remote regions in which the disease is endemic, a simple cheap sampling method is required for miltefosine quantification. The aims of this study were to validate a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method to quantify miltefosine in dried blood spot (DBS) samples and to validate its use with Ethiopian patients with visceral leishmaniasis (VL). Since hematocrit (Ht) levels are typically severely decreased in VL patients, returning to normal during treatment, the method was evaluated over a range of clinically relevant Ht values. Miltefosine was extracted from DBS samples using a simple method of pretreatment with methanol, resulting in >97% recovery. The method was validated over a calibration range of 10 to 2,000 ng/ml, and accuracy and precision were within ±11.2% and ≤7.0% (≤19.1% at the lower limit of quantification), respectively. The method was accurate and precise for blood spot volumes between 10 and 30 μl and for Ht levels of 20 to 35%, although a linear effect of Ht levels on miltefosine quantification was observed in the bioanalytical validation. DBS samples were stable for at least 162 days at 37°C. Clinical validation of the method using paired DBS and plasma samples from 16 VL patients showed a median observed DBS/plasma miltefosine concentration ratio of 0.99, with good correlation (Pearson'sr= 0.946). Correcting for patient-specific Ht levels did not further improve the concordance between the sampling methods. This successfully validated method to quantify miltefosine in DBS samples was demonstrated to be a valid and practical alternative to venous blood sampling that can be applied in future miltefosine pharmacokinetic studies with leishmaniasis patients, without Ht correction.

Indexed as

Antiprotozoal AgentsCalibrationChromatography, LiquidCoinfectionDried Blood Spot TestingDrug StabilityEthiopiaHematocritHIVHIV InfectionsHumansLeishmania donovaniLeishmaniasis, VisceralLimit of DetectionLiquid Phase MicroextractionPhosphorylcholineAntiprotozoal AgentsmiltefosinePhosphorylcholine

Identifiers

PMID26787691
PMCPMC4808221
OpenAlexW2255735283

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.