Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26787601›Full record

Trial reportJournal of nutrition education and behavior2016

Impact of a Worksite Diabetes Prevention Intervention on Diet Quality and Social Cognitive Influences of Health Behavior: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Carla K Miller, Kellie R Weinhold, Haikady N Nagaraja

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Carla K MillerDepartment of Human Sciences, Human Nutrition, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH. Electronic address: miller.4453@osu.edu.
Kellie R WeinholdDepartment of Human Sciences, Human Nutrition, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.
Haikady N NagarajaCollege of Public Health, Division of Biostatistics, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH.

Funding

Evaluation of a Lifestyle Intervention for Employees with PrediabetesR34DK093907 · NIDDK · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MILLER, CARLA K · 2012 to 2013
$464k
NIDDK NIH HHS R34 DK093907NIDDK NIH HHS R34DK093907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the impact of a worksite diabetes prevention intervention on secondary outcomes regarding the change in diet quality and components of the Health Action Process Approach (HAPA) theoretical framework.

designPretest-posttest control group design with 3-month follow-up.

settingUniversity worksite.

participantsEmployees aged 18-65 years with prediabetes (n = 68).

interventionA 16-week group-based intervention adapted from the Diabetes Prevention Program.

main outcome measuresDiet quality was assessed using the Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010; HAPA components were assessed via written questionnaire. ANALYSIS: Repeated-measures ANOVA compared the between- and within-group change in outcomes across time.

resultsSignificant difference occurred between groups for the change in consumption of nuts/legumes and red/processed meats postintervention and for fruits at 3-month follow-up (all P < .05); a significant increase in total Alternative Healthy Eating Index 2010 score occurred postintervention in the experimental group (P = .002). The changes in action planning, action self-efficacy, and coping self-efficacy from HAPA were significantly different between groups after the intervention; the change in outcome expectancies was significantly different between groups at 3-month follow-up (all P < .05). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The worksite intervention facilitated improvement in diet quality and in planning and efficacious beliefs regarding diabetes prevention. Further research is needed to evaluate the long-term impact of the intervention.

Indexed as

Health BehaviorWorkplaceAdultDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2DietFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleMiddle AgedSelf EfficacySurveys and Questionnairesdiabetes preventiondiet qualityself-efficacytype 2 diabetes mellitusworksite

Identifiers

PMID26787601
PMCPMC4788518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.