Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26787503›Full record

Trial reportCancer chemotherapy and pharmacology2016

Human mass balance study of TAS-102 using (14)C analyzed by accelerator mass spectrometry.

James J Lee, Jabed Seraj, Kenichiro Yoshida, Hirokazu Mizuguchi, Sandra Strychor, Jillian Fiejdasz, Tyeler Faulkner, Robert A Parise, Patrick Fawcett, Laura Pollice and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Cancer chemotherapy and pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Impact of renal function on non-hematologic toxicities in mCRC patients treated with TAS-102: a post-hoc analysis of the JASCC-CINV2001 study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Observational
  4. Article
  5. Biomarkers of Trifluridine-Tipiracil Efficacy.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

James J LeeCancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Hillman Research Pavilion, Suite G27E, 5117 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Jabed SerajTaiho Oncology Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Kenichiro YoshidaTaiho Oncology Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Hirokazu MizuguchiTaiho Oncology Inc., Princeton, NJ, USA.
Sandra StrychorCancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Hillman Research Pavilion, Suite G27E, 5117 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Jillian FiejdaszClinical Research Services, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Tyeler FaulknerClinical Research Services, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Robert A PariseCancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Hillman Research Pavilion, Suite G27E, 5117 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Patrick FawcettClinical Research Services, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Laura PolliceClinical Research Services, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Scott MasonDepartment of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
Jeremy HagueXceleron Inc., Germantown, MD, USA.
Marie CroftXceleron Inc., Germantown, MD, USA.
James NugterenXceleron Inc., Germantown, MD, USA.
Charles TedderINC Research LLC, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Weijing SunCancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Hillman Research Pavilion, Suite G27E, 5117 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Edward ChuCancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Hillman Research Pavilion, Suite G27E, 5117 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA.
Jan Hendrik BeumerCancer Therapeutics Program, University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, Hillman Research Pavilion, Suite G27E, 5117 Centre Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA. beumerj@gmail.com.
UPMC Hillman Cancer Center · USTaiho Oncology (United States) · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USINC Research (United States) · US

Funding

VECTOR CORE FACILITYP30CA047904 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI Jessie Nedrow · 1988 to 2026
$158.0M
UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE INSTITUTE: BPCAUL1RR024153 · NCRR · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2006 to 2011
$73.9M
University of Pittsburgh Clinical and Translational Science InstituteUL1TR000005 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI REIS, STEVEN E · 2012 to 2015
$50.8M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000005NCI NIH HHS P30 CA047904NCI NIH HHS P30CA047904NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024153NCRR NIH HHS UL1RR024153
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTAS-102 is an oral fluoropyrimidine prodrug composed of trifluridine (FTD) and tipiracil hydrochloride (TPI) in a 1:0.5 ratio. FTD is a thymidine analog, and it is degraded by thymidine phosphorylase (TP) to the inactive trifluoromethyluracil (FTY) metabolite. TPI inhibits degradation of FTD by TP, increasing systemic exposure to FTD.

methodsPatients with advanced solid tumors (6 M/2 F; median age 58 years; PS 0-1) were enrolled on this study. Patients in group A (N = 4) received 60 mg TAS-102 with 200 nCi [(14)C]-FTD, while patients in group B (N = 4) received 60 mg TAS-102 with 1000 nCi [(14)C]-TPI orally. Plasma, blood, urine, feces, and expired air (group A only) were collected up to 168 h and were analyzed for (14)C by accelerator mass spectrometry and analytes by LC-MS/MS.

resultsFTD: 59.8% of the (14)C dose was recovered: 54.8% in urine mostly as FTY and FTD glucuronide isomers. The extractable radioactivity in the pooled plasma consisted of 52.7% FTD and 33.2% FTY. TPI: 76.8% of the (14)C dose was recovered: 27.0% in urine mostly as TPI and 49.7% in feces. The extractable radioactivity in the pooled plasma consisted of 53.1% TPI and 30.9% 6-HMU, the major metabolite of TPI.

conclusionAbsorbed (14)C-FTD was metabolized and mostly excreted in urine. The majority of (14)C-TPI was recovered in feces, and the majority of absorbed TPI was excreted in urine. The current data with the ongoing hepatic and renal dysfunction studies will provide an enhanced understanding of the TAS-102 elimination profile.

Indexed as

AgedAntineoplastic AgentsChromatography, LiquidDrug CombinationsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPyrimidinesPyrrolidinesTandem Mass SpectrometryThymidine PhosphorylaseThymineTrifluridineUracilAntineoplastic AgentsDrug CombinationsPyrimidinesPyrrolidinesThymidine PhosphorylaseThyminetrifluoromethyluracilTrifluridinetrifluridine tipiracil drug combinationUracilExcretionMass balanceMetabolismRadiolabelTrifluorothymidine

Identifiers

PMID26787503
PMCPMC4767595
OpenAlexW2465784088

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.