ArticleBMC health services research2016
Written survey on recently deceased patients in germany and switzerland: how do general practitioners see their role?
Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adding a second surprise question triggers general practitioners to increase the thoroughness of palliative care planning: results of a pilot RCT with cage vignettes.BMC palliative care · 2018Trial
- General practitioners and palliative care practices: a better knowledge of specific services is still needed.BMC health services research · 2024Article
- Structured implementation of the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool in general practice - A prospective interventional study with follow-up.BMC palliative care · 2022Review
- Comparison of survival between patients receiving general outpatient palliative care and patients receiving other palliative care - analysis of data of a statutory health insurance data.BMC palliative care · 2022Article
- Quality of end-of-life care in general practice - a pre-post comparison of a two-tiered intervention.BMC primary care · 2022Article
- Provision of end-of-life care in primary care: a survey of issues and outcomes in the Australian context.BMJ open · 2022Article
- Continuity in palliative care - analysis of intersectoral palliative care based on routine data of a statutory health insurance.BMC palliative care · 2021Article
- Diagnostic and treatment barriers to persistent somatic symptoms in primary care - representative survey with physicians.BMC family practice · 2021Article
- GPs' perspective on End-of-Life Care - an evaluation based on the German version of the General Practice End of Life Care Index.German medical science : GMS e-journal · 2020Article
- General Practitioners' Attitudes towards Essential Competencies in End-of-Life Care: A Cross-Sectional Survey.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) play an important role in end-of-life care due to their proximity to the patient's dwelling-place and their contact to relatives and other care providers.
methodsIn order to get a better understanding of the role which the GP sees him- or herself as playing in end-of-life care and which care their dying patients get, we conducted this written survey. It asked questions about the most recently deceased patient of each physician. The questionnaire was sent to 1,201 GPs in southern North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) and the Canton of Bern (Switzerland).
resultsResponse rate was 27.5% (n = 330). The average age of responding physicians was 54.5 years (range: 34-76; standard derivation: 7.4), 68 % of them were male and 45% worked alone in their practice. Primary outcome measures of this observational study are the characteristics of recently deceased patients as well as their care and the involvement of other professional caregivers. Almost half of the most recently deceased patients had cancer. Only 3 to 16% of all deceased suffered from severe levels of pain, nausea, dyspnea or emesis. More than 80% of the doctors considered themselves to be an indispensable part of their patient's end-of-life care. Almost 90% of the doctors were in contact with the patient's family and 50% with the responsible nursing service. The majority of the GPs had taken over the coordination of care and cooperation with other attending physicians.
conclusionThe study confirms the relevance of caring for dying patients in GPs work and provides an important insight into their perception of their own role.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.