Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26787308›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Written survey on recently deceased patients in germany and switzerland: how do general practitioners see their role?

Rieke Schnakenberg, Adrian Goeldlin, Christina Boehm-Stiel, Markus Bleckwenn, Klaus Weckbecker, Lukas Radbruch

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Rieke SchnakenbergDepartment of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Medical Center Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. rieke.schnakenberg@ukb.uni-bonn.de.
Adrian GoeldlinInstitute of General Practice, University of Bern, Gesellschaftsstrasse 49, CH-3012, Bern, Switzerland. adrian.goeldlin@biham.unibe.ch.
Christina Boehm-StielDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. c.stiel@gmx.de.
Markus BleckwennDepartment of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Medical Center Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. markus.bleckwenn@ukb.uni-bonn.de.
Klaus WeckbeckerDepartment of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Medical Center Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. klaus.weckbecker@ukb.uni-bonn.de.
Lukas RadbruchDepartment of Palliative Medicine, University Medical Center Friedrich-Wilhelms-University Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Str. 25, 53127, Bonn, Germany. lukas.radbruch@ukb.uni-bonn.de.
University of Bonn · DEUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeneral practitioners (GPs) play an important role in end-of-life care due to their proximity to the patient's dwelling-place and their contact to relatives and other care providers.

methodsIn order to get a better understanding of the role which the GP sees him- or herself as playing in end-of-life care and which care their dying patients get, we conducted this written survey. It asked questions about the most recently deceased patient of each physician. The questionnaire was sent to 1,201 GPs in southern North Rhine-Westphalia (Germany) and the Canton of Bern (Switzerland).

resultsResponse rate was 27.5% (n = 330). The average age of responding physicians was 54.5 years (range: 34-76; standard derivation: 7.4), 68 % of them were male and 45% worked alone in their practice. Primary outcome measures of this observational study are the characteristics of recently deceased patients as well as their care and the involvement of other professional caregivers. Almost half of the most recently deceased patients had cancer. Only 3 to 16% of all deceased suffered from severe levels of pain, nausea, dyspnea or emesis. More than 80% of the doctors considered themselves to be an indispensable part of their patient's end-of-life care. Almost 90% of the doctors were in contact with the patient's family and 50% with the responsible nursing service. The majority of the GPs had taken over the coordination of care and cooperation with other attending physicians.

conclusionThe study confirms the relevance of caring for dying patients in GPs work and provides an important insight into their perception of their own role.

Indexed as

DeathPhysician's RoleSurveys and QuestionnairesAdultAgedCaregiversFemaleGeneral PractitionersGermanyHospice CareHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsSwitzerlandTerminal Care

Identifiers

PMID26787308
PMCPMC4719660
OpenAlexW2281740492

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.