Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26787227›Full record

SynthesisSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2016

Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of cannabinoids for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting--a systematic review of systematic reviews.

S Tafelski, W Häuser, M Schäfer

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
9.2field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Cannabis, cannabinoids and health: a review of evidence on risks and medical benefits.European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience · 2025
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Antiemetic Effects of Cannabinoid Agonists in Nonhuman Primates.The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics · 2020
    Article
  13. Cannabinoids in the Older Person: A Literature Review.Geriatrics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Leaner and greener analysis of cannabinoids.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2017
    Article
  19. Article
  20. [Cannabis as a therapeutic agent: Focal topic].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S TafelskiDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum und Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany. sascha.tafelski@charite.de.
W HäuserDepartment Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Saarbrücken, Saarbrucken, Germany.
M SchäferDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité University Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum und Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEKlinikum Saarbrücken · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThere is growing public and legislative body support for the medical use of cannabis products, for example, for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV), in Germany.

methodsA comprehensive literature search until November 2015 was conducted in MEDLINE, DARE and Cochrane libraries for systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing herbal or pharmaceutical cannabinoids (CB) versus placebo or conventional antiemetics for CINV. Outcomes were reduction of CINV for efficacy, drop-out rates due to adverse events for tolerability, and serious adverse events for safety. The methodology quality of the systematic reviews was evaluated by the tool assessment of multiple systematic reviews (AMSTAR).

resultsSix systematic reviews of RCTs included the pharmaceutical CBs dronabinol, levonantradol, and nabilone or whole plant extract (e.g., nabiximol) compared with placebo or conventional antiemetics. There was moderate quality evidence on the efficacy of CBs compared to placebo and conventional antiemetics for CINV. There was moderate quality evidence that pharmaceutical CBs were less tolerated and less safe than placebo and conventional antiemetics in CINV. One RCT examining whole plant extract was included into the systematic reviews. No RCT was found comparing CBs with neurokinine-1 receptor antagonists.

conclusionsWith safe and effective antiemetics available, CBs cannot be recommended as first- or second-line therapy for CINV. Some guidelines recommend pharmaceutical CBs as third-line treatment in the management of breakthrough nausea and vomiting. Due to the lack of RCT data and safety concerns, herbal cannabis cannot be recommended for CINV.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsHumansMedical MarijuanaNauseaTreatment OutcomeVomitingAntineoplastic AgentsMedical MarijuanaCannabinoidsChemotherapy-induced nausea and vomitingRandomized controlled trialSafetySystematic review of systematic reviewsTolerability

Identifiers

PMID26787227
OpenAlexW2277470694

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.