Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26787138›Full record

ArticleHuman brain mapping2016

Alterations in neural systems mediating cognitive flexibility and inhibition in mood disorders.

Camille Piguet, Yann Cojan, Virginie Sterpenich, Martin Desseilles, Gilles Bertschy, Patrik Vuilleumier

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human brain mapping, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Cognitive Control Network Homogeneity and Executive Functions in Late-Life Depression.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Contextual and Developmental Differences in the Neural Architecture of Cognitive Control.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Camille PiguetNeuroscience Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Yann CojanNeuroscience Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Virginie SterpenichNeuroscience Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Martin DesseillesNeuroscience Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
Gilles BertschyDepartment of Psychiatry and Mental Health, Strasbourg University Hospital, University of Strasbourg, INSERMu666, France.
Patrik VuilleumierNeuroscience Department, Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CHUniversité de Strasbourg · FRUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Impairment in mental flexibility may be a key component contributing to cardinal cognitive symptoms among mood disorders patients, particularly thought control disorders. Impaired ability to switch from one thought to another might reflect difficulties in either generating new mental states, inhibiting previous states, or both. However, the neural underpinnings of impaired cognitive flexibility in mood disorders remain largely unresolved. We compared a group of mood disorders patients (n = 29) and a group of matched healthy subjects (n = 32) on a novel task-switching paradigm involving happy and sad faces, that allowed us to separate generation of a new mental set (Switch Cost) and inhibition of the previous set during switching (Inhibition Cost), using fMRI. Behavioral data showed a larger Switch Cost in patients relative to controls, but the average Inhibition Cost did not differ between groups. At the neural level, a main effect of group was found with stronger activation of the subgenual cingulate cortex in patients. The larger Switch Cost in patients was reflected by a stronger recruitment of brain regions involved in attention and executive control, including the left intraparietal sulcus, precuneus, left inferior fontal gyrus, and right anterior cingulate. Critically, activity in the subgenual cingulate cortex was not downregulated by inhibition in patients relative to controls. In conclusion, mood disorder patients have exaggerated Switch Cost relative to controls, and this deficit in cognitive flexibility is associated with increased activation of the fronto-parietal attention networks, combined with impaired modulation of the subgenual cingulate cortex when inhibition of previous mental states is needed.

Indexed as

Inhibition, PsychologicalAdultCognitionCognition DisordersFemaleGyrus CinguliHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedMood DisordersNerve NetPhotic StimulationPsychomotor PerformanceRandom AllocationReaction TimefMRIinhibitionmood disorderssgACCtask-switch

Identifiers

PMID26787138
PMCPMC6867498
OpenAlexW2266499367

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.