Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26786925›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2016

Role of Adjuvant Therapy in a Population-Based Cohort of Patients With Early-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Chi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Derek Y Chan, Paul J Speicher, Brian C Gulack, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G Hartwig, Mark W Onaitis, Betty C Tong, Thomas A D'Amico, Mark F Berry and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 202 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-upAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2021
    Guideline
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Five-Decade Journey of Small Cell Lung Cancer.Cancer communications (London, England) · 2026
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Data fusion methods for the heterogeneity of treatment effect and confounding function.Bernoulli : official journal of the Bernoulli Society for Mathematical Statistics and Probability · 2025
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Current and future therapies for small cell lung carcinoma.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2025
    Review
  20. Article

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chi-Fu Jeffrey YangChi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Derek Y. Chan, Paul J. Speicher, Brian C. Gulack, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Mark W. Onaitis, Betty C. Tong, Thomas A. D'Amico, and David H. Harpole, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and Mark F. Berry, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Derek Y ChanChi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Derek Y. Chan, Paul J. Speicher, Brian C. Gulack, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Mark W. Onaitis, Betty C. Tong, Thomas A. D'Amico, and David H. Harpole, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and Mark F. Berry, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Paul J SpeicherChi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Derek Y. Chan, Paul J. Speicher, Brian C. Gulack, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Mark W. Onaitis, Betty C. Tong, Thomas A. D'Amico, and David H. Harpole, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and Mark F. Berry, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Brian C GulackChi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Derek Y. Chan, Paul J. Speicher, Brian C. Gulack, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Mark W. Onaitis, Betty C. Tong, Thomas A. D'Amico, and David H. Harpole, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and Mark F. Berry, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Xiaofei WangChi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Derek Y. Chan, Paul J. Speicher, Brian C. Gulack, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Mark W. Onaitis, Betty C. Tong, Thomas A. D'Amico, and David H. Harpole, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and Mark F. Berry, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Matthew G HartwigChi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Derek Y. Chan, Paul J. Speicher, Brian C. Gulack, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Mark W. Onaitis, Betty C. Tong, Thomas A. D'Amico, and David H. Harpole, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and Mark F. Berry, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Mark W OnaitisChi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Derek Y. Chan, Paul J. Speicher, Brian C. Gulack, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Mark W. Onaitis, Betty C. Tong, Thomas A. D'Amico, and David H. Harpole, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and Mark F. Berry, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Betty C TongChi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Derek Y. Chan, Paul J. Speicher, Brian C. Gulack, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Mark W. Onaitis, Betty C. Tong, Thomas A. D'Amico, and David H. Harpole, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and Mark F. Berry, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Thomas A D'AmicoChi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Derek Y. Chan, Paul J. Speicher, Brian C. Gulack, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Mark W. Onaitis, Betty C. Tong, Thomas A. D'Amico, and David H. Harpole, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and Mark F. Berry, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
Mark F BerryChi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Derek Y. Chan, Paul J. Speicher, Brian C. Gulack, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Mark W. Onaitis, Betty C. Tong, Thomas A. D'Amico, and David H. Harpole, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and Mark F. Berry, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA.
David H HarpoleChi-Fu Jeffrey Yang, Derek Y. Chan, Paul J. Speicher, Brian C. Gulack, Xiaofei Wang, Matthew G. Hartwig, Mark W. Onaitis, Betty C. Tong, Thomas A. D'Amico, and David H. Harpole, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC; and Mark F. Berry, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA. david.harpole@duke.edu.
Stanford Medicine · USUniversity Medical Center · USStanford University · US

Funding

Cardiothoracic Surgical Network Clinical CenterU01HL088953 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, PETER K · 2007 to 2013
$2.6M
Core Clinical Centers for the CTSNUM1HL088953 · NHLBI · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, PETER K · 2013 to 2017
$2.5M
NHLBI NIH HHS 5U01HL088953-05NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL088953NHLBI NIH HHS UM1 HL088953
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeData on optimal adjuvant therapy after complete resection of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) are limited, and in particular, there have been no studies evaluating the role of adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without prophylactic cranial irradiation, relative to no adjuvant therapy for stage T1-2N0M0 SCLC. This National Cancer Data Base analysis was performed to determine the potential benefits of adjuvant chemotherapy with and without prophylactic cranial irradiation in patients who undergo complete resection for early-stage small-cell lung cancer. PATIENTS AND

methodsOverall survival of patients with pathologic T1-2N0M0 SCLC who underwent complete resection in the National Cancer Data Base from 2003 to 2011, stratified by adjuvant therapy regimen, was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards analysis. Patients treated with induction therapy and those who died within 30 days of surgery were excluded from analysis.

resultsOf 1,574 patients who had pT1-2N0M0 SCLC during the study period, 954 patients (61%) underwent complete R0 resection with a 5-year survival of 47%. Adjuvant therapy was administered to 59% of patients (n = 566), including chemotherapy alone (n = 354), chemoradiation (n = 190, including 99 patients who underwent cranial irradiation), and radiation alone (n = 22). Compared with surgery alone, adjuvant chemotherapy with or without radiation was associated with significantly improved survival. In addition, multivariable Cox modeling demonstrated that treatment with adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.95) or chemotherapy with radiation directed at the brain (HR, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.75) was associated with improved survival when compared with no adjuvant therapy.

conclusionPatients with pT1-2N0M0 SCLC treated with surgical resection alone have worse outcomes than those who undergo resection with adjuvant chemotherapy alone or chemotherapy with cranial irradiation.

Indexed as

Cranial IrradiationPneumonectomyAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBrain NeoplasmsCarcinoma, Small CellChemotherapy, AdjuvantConfounding Factors, EpidemiologicFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLung NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Staging

Identifiers

PMID26786925
PMCPMC4933132
OpenAlexW2286489742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.