Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26786877›Full record

SynthesisJournal of general internal medicine2016

Impact of Electronic Medical Record Use on the Patient-Doctor Relationship and Communication: A Systematic Review.

Maria Alcocer Alkureishi, Wei Wei Lee, Maureen Lyons, Valerie G Press, Sara Imam, Akua Nkansah-Amankra, Deb Werner, Vineet M Arora

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of general internal medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 99 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
99citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

99 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Improving Patient-Provider Communication and Therapeutic Practice Through Better Integration of Electronic Health Records in the Exam Room: A Pilot Study.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2019
    Trial
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Level of Patient Satisfaction with Quality of Primary Healthcare in Almaty During COVID-19 Pandemic.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  18. Observational
  19. Artificial Intelligence Scribes in Psychiatry.Focus (American Psychiatric Publishing) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article

39 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Maria Alcocer AlkureishiDepartment of Academic Pediatrics, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA. malkureishi@peds.bsd.uchicago.edu.
Wei Wei LeeSection of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Maureen LyonsSection of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Valerie G PressSection of Hospital Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sara ImamCollege of the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Akua Nkansah-AmankraCollege of the University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Deb WernerJohn Crerar Library, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Vineet M AroraSection of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

Research Design, Data, and Analytics CoreP30DK092949 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI MARSHALL H CHIN · 2011 to 2026
$10.0M
Video vs. TTG Respiratory inhaler technique Assessment and InstructioN (V-TRAIN)K23HL118151 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI PRESS, VALERIE G · 2013 to 2016
$658k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL118151NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK092949
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWhile Electronic Medical Record (EMR) use has increased dramatically, the EMR's impact on the patient-doctor relationship remains unclear. This systematic literature review sought to understand the impact of EMR use on patient-doctor relationships and communication.

methodsParallel searches in Ovid MEDLINE, PubMed, Scopus, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, reference review of prior systematic reviews, meeting abstract reviews, and expert reviews from August 2013 to March 2015 were conducted. Medical Subject Heading terms related to EMR use were combined with keyword terms identifying face-to-face patient-doctor communication. English language observational or interventional studies (1995-2015) were included. Studies examining physician attitudes only were excluded. Structured data extraction compared study population, design, data collection method, and outcomes.

resultsFifty-three of 7445 studies reviewed met inclusion criteria. Included studies used behavioral analysis (28) to objectively measure communication behaviors using video or direct observation and pre-post or cross-sectional surveys to examine patient perceptions (25). Objective studies reported EMR communication behaviors that were both potentially negative (i.e., interrupted speech, low rates of screen sharing) and positive (i.e., facilitating questions). Studies examining overall patient perceptions of satisfaction, communication or the patient-doctor relationship (n = 22) reported no change with EMR use (16); a positive impact (5) or showed mixed results (1). Study quality was not assessable. Small sample sizes limited generalizability. Publication bias may limit findings. DISCUSSION: Despite objective evidence that EMR use may negatively impact patient-doctor communication, studies examining patient perceptions found no change in patient satisfaction or patient-doctor communication. Therefore, our findings should encourage providers to adopt the EMR as a communication tool. Future research is needed to better understand how to enhance patient-doctor- EMR communication. This research should correlate observed physician behavior to patient satisfaction, focus on physician communication skills training, and explore inpatient experiences.

Indexed as

CommunicationElectronic Health RecordsPhysician-Patient RelationsHumansPatient Satisfactioncommunicationelectronic medical recordsEMRpatient–doctor relationship

Identifiers

PMID26786877
PMCPMC4835363

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.