Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26786263›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2016

High Proliferation Predicts Pathological Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Early Breast Cancer.

Emilio Alba, Ana Lluch, Nuria Ribelles, Antonio Anton-Torres, Pedro Sanchez-Rovira, Joan Albanell, Lourdes Calvo, Jose Antonio Lopez García-Asenjo, Jose Palacios, Jose Ignacio Chacon and 11 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00432172 ("A Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Selective Neoadjuvant Treatment According to Immunohistochemical Subtype for HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Patients"), which is not on this map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00432172 phase2completednot on this map

"A Randomized Multicenter Phase II Trial to Evaluate the Effectiveness of Selective Neoadjuvant Treatment According to Immunohistochemical Subtype for HER2 Negative Breast Cancer Patients"

TypeinterventionalSponsorSpanish Breast Cancer Research GroupRan2007 to 2010Enrolled189ConditionsBreast CancerArmsEpirubicin, Cyclophosphamide, Docetaxel, Exemestane, Goserelin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Emilio AlbaVirgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Málaga, Spain ealbac@uma.es.
Ana LluchValencia University Hospital, Valencia, Spain.
Nuria RibellesVirgen de la Victoria University Hospital, Málaga, Spain.
Antonio Anton-TorresMiguel Servet University Hospital, Zaragoza, Spain.
Pedro Sanchez-RoviraJaén Hospital Complex, Jaen, Spain.
Joan AlbanellHospital del Mar Medical Research Institute-Institut Hospital del Mar d'Investigacions Mediques and Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona, Spain.
Lourdes CalvoA Coruña University Hospital Complex, A Coruña, Spain.
Jose Antonio Lopez García-AsenjoSan Carlos University Hospial, Madrid, Spain.
Jose PalaciosRamón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Jose Ignacio ChaconVirgen de la Salud Hospital, Toledo, Spain.
Amparo RuizValencian Institute of Oncology, Valencia, Spain.
Juan De la Haba-RodriguezBiomedical Research Institute, Reina Sofía Hospital Complex, Córdoba, Spain.
Miguel A Segui-PalmerParc Taulí Health Corporation, Barcelona, Spain.
Beatriz CirauquiGermans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Mireia MargeliGermans Trias i Pujol University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Arrate PlazaolaOnkologikoa, Donostia, Spain.
Agusti BarnadasSanta Creu i Sant Pau Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Maribel CasasGEICAM-Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group, Madrid, Spain.
Rosalia CaballeroGEICAM-Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group, Madrid, Spain.
Eva CarrascoGEICAM-Spanish Breast Cancer Research Group, Madrid, Spain.
Federico RojoFundación Jiménez Diaz University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the neoadjuvant setting, changes in the proliferation marker Ki67 are associated with primary endocrine treatment efficacy, but its value as a predictor of response to chemotherapy is still controversial. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe analyzed 262 patients with centralized basal Ki67 immunohistochemical evaluation derived from 4 GEICAM (Spanish Breast Cancer Group) clinical trials of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer. The objective was to identify the optimal threshold for Ki67 using the receiver-operating characteristic curve method to maximize its predictive value for chemotherapy benefit. We also evaluated the predictive role of the defined Ki67 cutoffs for molecular subtypes defined by estrogen receptor (ER) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2).

resultsA basal Ki67 cutpoint of 50% predicted pathological complete response (pCR). Patients with Ki67 >50% achieved a pCR rate of 40% (36 of 91) versus a pCR rate of 19% in patients with Ki67 ≤ 50% (33 of 171) (p = .0004). Ki67 predictive value was especially relevant in ER-HER2- and ER-HER2+ patients (pCR rates of 42% and 64%, respectively, in patients with Ki67 >50% versus 15% and 45%, respectively, in patients with Ki67 ≤ 50%; p = .0337 and .3238, respectively). Both multivariate analyses confirmed the independent predictive value of the Ki67 cutpoint of 50%.

conclusionBasal Ki67 proliferation index >50% should be considered an independent predictive factor for pCR reached after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, suggesting that cell proliferation is a phenomenon closely related to chemosensitivity. These findings could help to identify a group of patients with a potentially favorable long-term prognosis. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The use of basal Ki67 status as a predictive factor of chemotherapy benefit could facilitate the identification of a patient subpopulation with high probability of achieving pathological complete response when treated with primary chemotherapy, and thus with a potentially favorable long-term prognosis.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsClinical Trials as TopicDisease-Free SurvivalErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesEstrogen Receptor alphaFemaleHumansKi-67 AntigenMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyNeoplasm StagingPredictive Value of TestsPrognosisERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaKi-67 AntigenBreast cancerChemosensitivityKi67Neoadjuvant chemotherapyPredictive factor

Identifiers

PMID26786263
PMCPMC4746087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.