Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26786262›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2016

Phase II Study of Olaparib (AZD-2281) After Standard Systemic Therapies for Disseminated Colorectal Cancer.

Lawrence Leichman, Susan Groshen, Bert H O'Neil, Wells Messersmith, Jordan Berlin, Emily Chan, Cynthia G Leichman, Steven J Cohen, Deirdre Cohen, Heinz-Josef Lenz and 7 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Targeted Treatment against Cancer Stem Cells in Colorectal Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  7. Article
  8. PARP Inhibitors in Colorectal Malignancies: A 2023 Update.Reviews on recent clinical trials · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. The Genomic Environment ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 11 institutions in 3 countries.

Lawrence LeichmanNew York University, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA Lawrence.Leichman@nyumc.org.
Susan GroshenUniversity of Southern California, Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Bert H O'NeilIndiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.
Wells MessersmithUniversity of Colorado Cancer Center, Aurora, Colorado, USA.
Jordan BerlinVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Emily ChanVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Cynthia G LeichmanNew York University, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Steven J CohenFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Deirdre CohenNew York University, Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA.
Heinz-Josef LenzUniversity of Southern California, Norris Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Philip GoldSwedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Bruce BomanHelen F. Graham Cancer Center and Research Institute, Newark, Deleware, USA.
Anitra FieldingAstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom.
Gershon LockerAstraZeneca, Macclesfield, United Kingdom.
Ronald C CasonUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas, USA.
Stan R HamiltonUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, Texas, USA.
Howard S HochsterYale University Cancer Center, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
New York University · USAstraZeneca (United Kingdom) · GBThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUSC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center · USVanderbilt University Medical Center · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USKitware (United States) · USSwedish Medical Center · USUniversity of Colorado Denver · USYale University · US

Funding

WORD PROCESSING CENTER--COREP30CA006927 · NCI · RESEARCH INST OF FOX CHASE CAN CTR · PI Margaret von Mehren · 1985 to 2026
$138.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA006927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEffective new agents for patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) with disease progression during standard therapy regimens are needed. We hypothesized that poly ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitor therapy in patients with CRC and inefficient tumor DNA repair mechanisms, such as those with high-level microsatellite instability (MSI-H), would result in synthetic lethality.

methodsThis was an open-label phase II trial testing olaparib 400 mg p.o. b.i.d. for patients with disseminated, measurable CRC failing standard therapies with centrally confirmed tumor MSI status. The primary endpoint was the tumor response, assessed by RECIST, version 1.0. The secondary endpoints were safety/toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).

resultsThirty-three patients (20 microsatellite stable [MSS], 13 MSI-H) were enrolled. The median age for all patients was 57 years and for MSS and MSI-H patients was 51 and 61 years, respectively. All patients received at least one 28-day cycle of olaparib. No patient had a complete or partial response. Nausea (48%), fatigue (36%), and vomiting (33%) were the most commonly reported treatment-related adverse events. The median PFS for all patients was 1.84 months. No statistically significant differences were found in the median PFS or OS for the MSS group compared with the MSI-H group.

conclusionSingle-agent olaparib delivered after failure of standard systemic therapy did not demonstrate activity for CRC patients, regardless of microsatellite status. Future trials, testing PARP inhibitors in patients with CRC should focus on the use of DNA-damaging chemotherapy and/or radiation therapy, combined with PARP inhibitors, remembering the toxicity reported in the present study. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Microsatellite instability (MSI-H) colorectal tumors exhibit hypermethylation in tumor mismatch repair genes, or have mutations in one or more of these genes resulting from a germ-line defect (Lynch syndrome). PARP inhibitors such as olaparib are most effective in tumors associated with inability to repair DNA damage. However, in this trial, single agent olaparib failed to elicit responses in patients with MSI-H colorectal tumors, and in those with microsatellite-stable tumors. It is possible that by adding olaparib to radiation therapy, or to a systemic DNA damaging agent, tumor lethality could be obtained. However, the price would be increased toxicity.

Indexed as

AdultAgedColorectal NeoplasmsDisease-Free SurvivalDNA MethylationDNA Mismatch RepairFemaleHumansMaleMicrosatellite InstabilityMiddle AgedPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsolaparibPhthalazinesPiperazinesPoly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase InhibitorsColon cancerPARP inhibitor

Identifiers

PMID26786262
PMCPMC4746089
OpenAlexW2265625172

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.