Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26786109›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of biological chemistry2016

Different Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Agonists Produce Unique Signatures for the Recruitment of Downstream Signaling Proteins.

Tom Ronan, Jennifer L Macdonald-Obermann, Lorel Huelsmann, Nicholas J Bessman, Kristen M Naegle, Linda J Pike

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of biological chemistry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beyond the membrane: rethinking EGFR signaling in physiology and cancer.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The association of urinary epidermal growth factors with ADPKD disease severity and progression.Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association · 2023
    Article
  8. ErbBs in Lens Cell Fibrosis and Secondary Cataract.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Ligand bias in receptor tyrosine kinase signaling.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tom RonanFrom the Department of Biomedical Engineering and Center for Biological Systems Engineering and.
Jennifer L Macdonald-ObermannDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 and.
Lorel HuelsmannDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 and.
Nicholas J Bessmanthe Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Graduate Group in Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6059.
Kristen M NaegleFrom the Department of Biomedical Engineering and Center for Biological Systems Engineering and. Electronic address: knaegle@wustl.edu.
Linda J PikeDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri 63110 and. Electronic address: pike@biochem.wustl.edu.
Washington University in St. Louis · USUniversity of Pennsylvania · US

Funding

ERBB RECEPTOR HOMO- AND HETERO- DIMERIZATIONR01CA079992 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI LEMMON, MARK A · 1999 to 2013
$3.7M
HETERODIMERIZATION IN ERBB RECEPTORSR01GM099695 · NIGMS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI PIKE, LINDA JOY · 2012 to 2015
$1.1M
NCI NIH HHS R01-CA079992NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM099695NIGMS NIH HHS R01GM099695
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The EGF receptor can bind seven different agonist ligands. Although each agonist appears to stimulate the same suite of downstream signaling proteins, different agonists are capable of inducing distinct responses in the same cell. To determine the basis for these differences, we used luciferase fragment complementation imaging to monitor the recruitment of Cbl, CrkL, Gab1, Grb2, PI3K, p52 Shc, p66 Shc, and Shp2 to the EGF receptor when stimulated by the seven EGF receptor ligands. Recruitment of all eight proteins was rapid, dose-dependent, and inhibited by erlotinib and lapatinib, although to differing extents. Comparison of the time course of recruitment of the eight proteins in response to a fixed concentration of each growth factor revealed differences among the growth factors that could contribute to their differing biological effects. Principal component analysis of the resulting data set confirmed that the recruitment of these proteins differed between agonists and also between different doses of the same agonist. Ensemble clustering of the overall response to the different growth factors suggests that these EGF receptor ligands fall into two major groups as follows: (i) EGF, amphiregulin, and EPR; and (ii) betacellulin, TGFα, and epigen. Heparin-binding EGF is distantly related to both clusters. Our data identify differences in network utilization by different EGF receptor agonists and highlight the need to characterize network interactions under conditions other than high dose EGF.

Indexed as

AnimalsCHO CellsCricetulusEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsLigandsSignal TransductionEpidermal Growth FactorErbB ReceptorsLigandscancer biologyepidermal growth factor (EGF)epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)growth factorreceptor tyrosine kinasesystems biology

Identifiers

PMID26786109
PMCPMC4786695
OpenAlexW2295512811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.